"The more I study this virus and its Spike Protein, the more I am convinced that ACE2, as a receptor, is perhaps the most diabolical receptor a virus can use to cause both rapid and gradual decline in the human body." It was certainly engineered to cause maximum damage with maximum plausible deniability.
I've been getting C-Reactive Protein tests yearly going back to 2005. It's always around 0.2 to 0.3. Since January 2022, I've had "Covid" twice, the second time being this previous February. The acute phase wasn't bad either time, but I was left with long covid sx after round one and round two has also messed me up pretty badly. This april, got my CRP tested again and it was 3.2. Also my PSA went from 0.5 to 3.1.
I used to look very young for my age (52) but I swear my skin has aged dramatically over the last year; I've lost muscle mass; and it feels like my formerly toned and in-shape physique has just vanished.
As an alternative medicine practitioner (Chinese medicine and acupuncture), it's been disturbing because I am well familiar with all of the herbs and nutriceuticals you've written about in your fine Substack. Nothing has seemed to help. I can barely work anymore. Anyhow, I appreciate your work as always.
You never mention the vaccine produced Spike Proteins. It’s almost like you are trying to pin this exclusively on a Covid infection? Why is there no mention of the foreign spike protein that the body of a vaccinated person produces (apparently with no end) not mentioned here. This seems strange?
"I still remember the day when the experiment was over, and I looked at the artery walls of the guinea pigs under the microscope. The guinea pigs receiving vitamin C at a daily dose comparable to the human recommended daily allowance (RDA) had developed the same deposits in their artery walls that cause heart attacks and strokes in human beings. However, those animals that received the equivalent of two teaspoonfuls of vitamin C per day, comparable to human body weight, had maintained clean arteries. Most importantly, this striking difference was not obtained by adding cholesterol or fat to the animals’ diet, but by omitting one single factor from it: vitamin C."
Were the patients of the study vaccinated? I don't see this called out in the study anywhere so is there some way that the study is ruling out the vaccine as a confounder?
Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins is the basis of nanoparticle bio-reactivity. This interaction gives rise to the formation of a dynamic nanoparticle-protein corona. The protein corona may influence cellular uptake, inflammation, accumulation, degradation and clearance of the nanoparticles. Furthermore, the nanoparticle surface can induce conformational changes in adsorbed protein molecules which may affect the overall bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle.
Would maintaining intracellular magnesium levels counter this? I realise most would not take enough magnesium due to mainstream RDI and if inflammation is already present perhaps high does will be required? - more info in Thomas Levy books or here:
"Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies report a close relationship between serum magnesium concentration and cardiovascular disease risk in the general population. In end-stage renal disease, an association was found between serum magnesium and survival. Hypomagnesemia was identified as a strong predictor for cardiovascular disease in these patients. A substantial body of in vitro and in vivo studies has identified a protective role for magnesium in vascular calcification. However, the precise mechanisms and its contribution to cardiovascular protection remain unclear. There are currently 2 leading hypotheses: first, magnesium may bind phosphate and delay calcium phosphate crystal growth in the circulation, thereby passively interfering with calcium phosphate deposition in the vessel wall. Second, magnesium may regulate vascular smooth muscle cell transdifferentiation toward an osteogenic phenotype by active cellular modulation of factors associated with calcification. Here, the data supporting these major hypotheses are reviewed. The literature supports both a passive inorganic phosphate–buffering role reducing hydroxyapatite formation and an active cell-mediated role, directly targeting vascular smooth muscle transdifferentiation. However, current evidence relies on basic experimental designs that are often insufficient to delineate the underlying mechanisms. The field requires more advanced experimental design, including determination of intracellular magnesium concentrations and the identification of the molecular players that regulate magnesium concentrations in vascular smooth muscle cells."
Thank you for this article. Do you have any thoughts on how particular SNPs affect the risk for atherosclerosis when combined with C19 infection or vaccination? Also, any thoughts on corrective supplementation?
Im following your research desperately, after two years of long covid I’m deteriorating still. Chlorine dioxide was the only thing that helped for a while and then the kidneys started to show signs of failure, they couldn’t handle either the mms or the crazy amount of debris I was pissing out.
So, the pathobiology of internal calcification so internal calcification first starts off with atherosclerosis so atherosclerosis occurs before internal calcification and we know that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process that starts with damage of the endothelium then monocytes enter the artery and differentiate into macrophages which proliferate locally they ingest oxidized lipids and then they slowly start to turn into large foamy macrophages and then they eventually die and which further propagates the inflammatory process in addition the smooth muscle cells start to proliferate and they migrate from the vessel wall in response to cytokines that is secreted by damaged endothelium cells and by the dying cells and they help and these smooth muscle cells are thought to help form the fibrous cap then the calcification starts to occur and internal calcification really resembles endochondral bone formation and although the initiation of the calcification does not require participation by specific cells but the progression of the lesion is thought to be likely driven by chondrocyte-like cells and associated with expression of inflammatory factors like cytokines…
I also have noticed the premature aging after friends/relatives have gotten their jabs and boosters: the more jabs they get, the worse/older they look. you can look upon a crowd of older people and easily see they don't look well, they look 'aged'.
On a related subject of Spike Protein (SP) attacking the cardiovascular system/endothelium, I am experiencing a SP induced auto-immune case of vasculitis in one of my heels/feet/ankle and the it's like something has attacked the bone/tendons/fascia such that one foot is like 20 years older than the other foot.
Apparently the most common adverse health complaint (per Naomi Wolf's reporting) is joint point.
Report 71: Musculoskeletal Adverse Events of Special Interest Afflicted 8.5% of Patients in Pfizer’s Post-Marketing Data Set, Including Four Children and One Infant. Women Affected at a Ratio of Almost 4:1 Over Men: The most common adverse event was arthralgia/joint pain (3,525 or 97%), followed by 70 arthritis AESIs (2%), 26 rheumatoid arthritis AESIs (<1%) and 5 AESIs (<1%) polyarthritis.
Read this article regarding SP induced arthritis, etc.
A new review suggests that COVID vaccines "may trigger" rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including arthritis, vasculitis, lupus, and adult-onset Still's disease.
Rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (R-IMIDs) involve inflammation that manifests in the joints, tendons, muscles, and bones due to an unknown cause.
Of those injured reported developing arthritis after taking the vaccine, primarily manifesting in the knees, elbows, and ankles.
IMPORTANT! Chlorine dioxide oxidizes the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which accelerates metabolism. This is how it provides beneficial results, BUT it is extremely toxic and dangerous. Methylene blue also oxidizes (removes excess electrons) from the electron transport chain, so it has similar beneficial effects but is FAR MORE safe than chlorine dioxide. Its mode of action is explained here: Crucial Facts About Your Metabolism, Part 2 - Interview with Georgi Dinkov; https://www.bitchute.com/video/B2RIz3i37hMA/.
IMPORTANT! Chlorine dioxide oxidizes the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which accelerates metabolism. This is how it provides beneficial results, BUT it is extremely toxic and dangerous. Methylene blue also oxidizes (removes excess electrons) from the electron transport chain, so it has similar beneficial effects but is FAR MORE safe than chlorine dioxide. Its mode of action is explained here: Crucial Facts About Your Metabolism, Part 2 - Interview with Georgi Dinkov; https://www.bitchute.com/video/B2RIz3i37hMA/.
"The more I study this virus and its Spike Protein, the more I am convinced that ACE2, as a receptor, is perhaps the most diabolical receptor a virus can use to cause both rapid and gradual decline in the human body." It was certainly engineered to cause maximum damage with maximum plausible deniability.
I've been getting C-Reactive Protein tests yearly going back to 2005. It's always around 0.2 to 0.3. Since January 2022, I've had "Covid" twice, the second time being this previous February. The acute phase wasn't bad either time, but I was left with long covid sx after round one and round two has also messed me up pretty badly. This april, got my CRP tested again and it was 3.2. Also my PSA went from 0.5 to 3.1.
I used to look very young for my age (52) but I swear my skin has aged dramatically over the last year; I've lost muscle mass; and it feels like my formerly toned and in-shape physique has just vanished.
As an alternative medicine practitioner (Chinese medicine and acupuncture), it's been disturbing because I am well familiar with all of the herbs and nutriceuticals you've written about in your fine Substack. Nothing has seemed to help. I can barely work anymore. Anyhow, I appreciate your work as always.
You never mention the vaccine produced Spike Proteins. It’s almost like you are trying to pin this exclusively on a Covid infection? Why is there no mention of the foreign spike protein that the body of a vaccinated person produces (apparently with no end) not mentioned here. This seems strange?
"I still remember the day when the experiment was over, and I looked at the artery walls of the guinea pigs under the microscope. The guinea pigs receiving vitamin C at a daily dose comparable to the human recommended daily allowance (RDA) had developed the same deposits in their artery walls that cause heart attacks and strokes in human beings. However, those animals that received the equivalent of two teaspoonfuls of vitamin C per day, comparable to human body weight, had maintained clean arteries. Most importantly, this striking difference was not obtained by adding cholesterol or fat to the animals’ diet, but by omitting one single factor from it: vitamin C."
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/linus-pauling-connection-to-ig-farben?utm_medium=reader2
Relatives and I THOUGHT we noticed rapid aging in those close to us that submitted.
Were the patients of the study vaccinated? I don't see this called out in the study anywhere so is there some way that the study is ruling out the vaccine as a confounder?
These are hypotheses against facts;
This is due to nanotechnology.
Why are you refusing to investigate this?
https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-3155-11-26
Abstract
Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins is the basis of nanoparticle bio-reactivity. This interaction gives rise to the formation of a dynamic nanoparticle-protein corona. The protein corona may influence cellular uptake, inflammation, accumulation, degradation and clearance of the nanoparticles. Furthermore, the nanoparticle surface can induce conformational changes in adsorbed protein molecules which may affect the overall bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5617637/
Etc.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/evidence-of-crimes-against-humanity
https://outraged.substack.com/p/chuck-norris-against-quantum-dots
https://outraged.substack.com/p/2-nobel-prizes-for-tagging-humans
The discoveries on these "Vaccines" just keep getting "better" (sarcasm)!
Aren't you cheerful
Would maintaining intracellular magnesium levels counter this? I realise most would not take enough magnesium due to mainstream RDI and if inflammation is already present perhaps high does will be required? - more info in Thomas Levy books or here:
"Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies report a close relationship between serum magnesium concentration and cardiovascular disease risk in the general population. In end-stage renal disease, an association was found between serum magnesium and survival. Hypomagnesemia was identified as a strong predictor for cardiovascular disease in these patients. A substantial body of in vitro and in vivo studies has identified a protective role for magnesium in vascular calcification. However, the precise mechanisms and its contribution to cardiovascular protection remain unclear. There are currently 2 leading hypotheses: first, magnesium may bind phosphate and delay calcium phosphate crystal growth in the circulation, thereby passively interfering with calcium phosphate deposition in the vessel wall. Second, magnesium may regulate vascular smooth muscle cell transdifferentiation toward an osteogenic phenotype by active cellular modulation of factors associated with calcification. Here, the data supporting these major hypotheses are reviewed. The literature supports both a passive inorganic phosphate–buffering role reducing hydroxyapatite formation and an active cell-mediated role, directly targeting vascular smooth muscle transdifferentiation. However, current evidence relies on basic experimental designs that are often insufficient to delineate the underlying mechanisms. The field requires more advanced experimental design, including determination of intracellular magnesium concentrations and the identification of the molecular players that regulate magnesium concentrations in vascular smooth muscle cells."
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309182
Thank you for this article. Do you have any thoughts on how particular SNPs affect the risk for atherosclerosis when combined with C19 infection or vaccination? Also, any thoughts on corrective supplementation?
I’ve been telling everybody I can, DMSO is one of the best weapons against this crap.
https://ia902903.us.archive.org/28/items/h.-r.-6666/DMSO%20%26%20Atherosclerosis_text.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20571430/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3681702/
Im following your research desperately, after two years of long covid I’m deteriorating still. Chlorine dioxide was the only thing that helped for a while and then the kidneys started to show signs of failure, they couldn’t handle either the mms or the crazy amount of debris I was pissing out.
Something is wrong with this quote:
So, the pathobiology of internal calcification so internal calcification first starts off with atherosclerosis so atherosclerosis occurs before internal calcification and we know that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process that starts with damage of the endothelium then monocytes enter the artery and differentiate into macrophages which proliferate locally they ingest oxidized lipids and then they slowly start to turn into large foamy macrophages and then they eventually die and which further propagates the inflammatory process in addition the smooth muscle cells start to proliferate and they migrate from the vessel wall in response to cytokines that is secreted by damaged endothelium cells and by the dying cells and they help and these smooth muscle cells are thought to help form the fibrous cap then the calcification starts to occur and internal calcification really resembles endochondral bone formation and although the initiation of the calcification does not require participation by specific cells but the progression of the lesion is thought to be likely driven by chondrocyte-like cells and associated with expression of inflammatory factors like cytokines…
I also have noticed the premature aging after friends/relatives have gotten their jabs and boosters: the more jabs they get, the worse/older they look. you can look upon a crowd of older people and easily see they don't look well, they look 'aged'.
On a related subject of Spike Protein (SP) attacking the cardiovascular system/endothelium, I am experiencing a SP induced auto-immune case of vasculitis in one of my heels/feet/ankle and the it's like something has attacked the bone/tendons/fascia such that one foot is like 20 years older than the other foot.
Apparently the most common adverse health complaint (per Naomi Wolf's reporting) is joint point.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-naomi-wolf-details-her-latest
Report 71: Musculoskeletal Adverse Events of Special Interest Afflicted 8.5% of Patients in Pfizer’s Post-Marketing Data Set, Including Four Children and One Infant. Women Affected at a Ratio of Almost 4:1 Over Men: The most common adverse event was arthralgia/joint pain (3,525 or 97%), followed by 70 arthritis AESIs (2%), 26 rheumatoid arthritis AESIs (<1%) and 5 AESIs (<1%) polyarthritis.
Read this article regarding SP induced arthritis, etc.
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/covid-19-vaccines-may-trigger-rheumatic-inflammatory-diseases-study
A new review suggests that COVID vaccines "may trigger" rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including arthritis, vasculitis, lupus, and adult-onset Still's disease.
Rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (R-IMIDs) involve inflammation that manifests in the joints, tendons, muscles, and bones due to an unknown cause.
Of those injured reported developing arthritis after taking the vaccine, primarily manifesting in the knees, elbows, and ankles.
IMPORTANT! Chlorine dioxide oxidizes the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which accelerates metabolism. This is how it provides beneficial results, BUT it is extremely toxic and dangerous. Methylene blue also oxidizes (removes excess electrons) from the electron transport chain, so it has similar beneficial effects but is FAR MORE safe than chlorine dioxide. Its mode of action is explained here: Crucial Facts About Your Metabolism, Part 2 - Interview with Georgi Dinkov; https://www.bitchute.com/video/B2RIz3i37hMA/.
Here is another in depth information package on methylene blue: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XVV45KQztfmf/.
IMPORTANT! Chlorine dioxide oxidizes the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which accelerates metabolism. This is how it provides beneficial results, BUT it is extremely toxic and dangerous. Methylene blue also oxidizes (removes excess electrons) from the electron transport chain, so it has similar beneficial effects but is FAR MORE safe than chlorine dioxide. Its mode of action is explained here: Crucial Facts About Your Metabolism, Part 2 - Interview with Georgi Dinkov; https://www.bitchute.com/video/B2RIz3i37hMA/.
Here is another in depth information package on methylene blue: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XVV45KQztfmf/.