I love your efforts to contribute to the cure and treatment for the damage this virus and "vaccine"-not a- vaccine has done. Your writing is far above my pay grade, but having read so much about the topic over the last 3 years, I can now understand some of it. Thank You.
Of course authorities, hospitals and doctors would have to acknowledge that the spike is toxic and can cause cancers - or cancer-like problems - before treatment could commence, and I doubt they'll do that. It would be an admission of the inherrent dangers of the Covid 'vaccines' as well as probably casting doubt on the mRNA platform itself, the use of which is only in it's infancy. Everything under the sun will be reformulated into cheaper, faster, mRNA 'vaccines' and drugs, the shitshow is sadly only beginning
It was SO cool to run across an article in TabletMag praising your work alongside Luc Montangier (sp?). I found you > 2 years ago and was awed and cited much of your work. Talk about over the target. Thrilled to see your work recognized Walter!
As the multi-toxic nature of spike is progressively unveiled and understood so should the multi-toxic nature of "vaccine" Mrna generated spike, with its similarities to and differences from multi-toxic nature of cov2 spike.
one for instance; is bioweapon bacterial superantigen Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) - - an old school bioweapon in the bioweapon stockpiles in the world, undoubtedly in china. Once a US mainstay and now?, undoubtedly still the US stockpile for research purposes, etc.,
The sum and substance of which is located "The SAg-like motif (my note: SAg = superantigen) (residues E661–R685) lies at the C terminus of S1 (Cheng et al., 2020), at the boundary with S2."
Is this superantigen site in Mrna generated spike? If so, why was it not Identified and removed initially? or by now? as well as all the other toxic sites, prion etc, on and in spike to be replicated by means of Mrna? Is the person who gets shot protected from some toxic spike sites so long as the Mrna generated spike is in the "2P mutation", attempting to lock S1 and S2, state?
"A monoclonal antibody against staphylococcal enterotoxin B superantigen inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry in vitro"
SUMMARY "We recently discovered a superantigen-like motif sequentially and structurally similar to a staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) segment, near the S1/S2 cleavage site of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which might explain the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) observed in children and the cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients. We show here that an anti-SEB monoclonal antibody (mAb), 6D3, can bind this viral motif at its polybasic (PRRA) insert to inhibit infection in live virus assays."
"Superantigenic character of an insert unique to SARS-CoV-2 spike supported by skewed TCR repertoire in patients with hyperinflammation"
"The binding epitope (my note: S1 subunit?) on S harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B"
S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study
Thank You PeaceLily, ( previous comment on the "theme" posted to deNutrients - News to Use)
I Am waiting for such as the studies you linked to acknowledge and elucidate the full extent of and by which means agent Mrna "spike" also causes injury. Also waiting for the full answer to a question (referenced below) asked on the Vejon Health youtube channel in the "Are there Long Term Health Risks associated with the Spike Protein?" video - an answer showing who knew what when about the toxic nature of" spike" S1 subunit at the time of the terrible decision to choose to program agent Mrna compelled creation of "spike" for "vaccine" antigen. as well as the
Dr. Abdul Mannan Baig asked, concerning why "they" would engineer the agent Mrna to cause the cell to create the "2P mutation" ? in the created "vaccine" "spike" antigen. "frequent ACS Chemical Neuroscience contributor, Dr. Abdul Mannan Baig" may want to read the "official story" found at the ACS Chemical & Engineering News site, search "The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines" There may well be certain omissions dealing with what they knew about the especially toxic nature of the S1 spike sub-unit when it is separated from the S2 sub-unit, ( and S2 when separated from S1) hence another reason to TRY to lock the S1 and S2 spike sub-units together. I have listened to doctors describe the S1 sub-unit of the cov2 "spike", as "the most toxic protein in the world" when it is NOT bound with the S2 "spike" sub-unit referring not only to the potency of unbound S1 as a toxin but its also heretofore never before seen multi-toxic nature causing such a large number and diversity of disease. Yes, they engineered agent Mrna to "create" mutated ("2P mutation") spike by "adding two prolines - the most rigid of the 20 amino acids - to a key joint of a vaccine’s spike protein" to try to keep the S1 and S2 "spike" sub-units bound together thus in the less poisonous state. In theory, in a state of the art lab? It can work?. In a "vaccine" plant set up at "warped speed" there is - mis-manufacturing, deep cold storage and shipment required - there is degradation, injected into millions - there is breakdown of the spike, separation of the sub-units. poison? yes
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19
"These data suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein alone is sufficient to trigger a broad proteomic change in the skull marrow, meninges, and brain compared to the HA protein. The dysregulated proteins are enriched in pathways related to coronavirus disease, NETs formation, and neutrophil degranulation, consistent with the changes observed in virus-infected human samples. Our data also suggest that spike S1 protein circulation in the blood would be an important trigger of COVID-19-related broader proteome change in the skull marrow, meninges, and brain cortex."
"The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit S1 induces COVID-19-like acute lung injury"
"The team found that 11-of-13 participants had low levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein (S1 subunit) as early as one day post-vaccination." my note: so soon "freed up", available to do damage, toxic S1 subunit
The spike is the result of cell death, not the cause.
Treat the elimination of the lipids which slow down bloodflow especially in organs.
If you don't believe me, there's a control experiment of cultures done by Stefan Lanka that shows that even without "virus" the toxic ingredients, the result is identical to the one with virus.
1.) the same pharma companies, medical entities, global opportunists and government tyrants that brought the populace this virus and the vaxxine would now be interested in assisting the affected populace,
and
2.) the same (above) would stand to benefit financially, yet again, in providing these therapeutic agents to the same populace that they caused the phenomenon in,
I’ve been in contact with multiple people who took Ledifos, and are now back to normal. They had to order from India. It’s cheap there, and the price of a car in the states.
I love your efforts to contribute to the cure and treatment for the damage this virus and "vaccine"-not a- vaccine has done. Your writing is far above my pay grade, but having read so much about the topic over the last 3 years, I can now understand some of it. Thank You.
Of course authorities, hospitals and doctors would have to acknowledge that the spike is toxic and can cause cancers - or cancer-like problems - before treatment could commence, and I doubt they'll do that. It would be an admission of the inherrent dangers of the Covid 'vaccines' as well as probably casting doubt on the mRNA platform itself, the use of which is only in it's infancy. Everything under the sun will be reformulated into cheaper, faster, mRNA 'vaccines' and drugs, the shitshow is sadly only beginning
It was SO cool to run across an article in TabletMag praising your work alongside Luc Montangier (sp?). I found you > 2 years ago and was awed and cited much of your work. Talk about over the target. Thrilled to see your work recognized Walter!
As the multi-toxic nature of spike is progressively unveiled and understood so should the multi-toxic nature of "vaccine" Mrna generated spike, with its similarities to and differences from multi-toxic nature of cov2 spike.
one for instance; is bioweapon bacterial superantigen Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) - - an old school bioweapon in the bioweapon stockpiles in the world, undoubtedly in china. Once a US mainstay and now?, undoubtedly still the US stockpile for research purposes, etc.,
The sum and substance of which is located "The SAg-like motif (my note: SAg = superantigen) (residues E661–R685) lies at the C terminus of S1 (Cheng et al., 2020), at the boundary with S2."
Is this superantigen site in Mrna generated spike? If so, why was it not Identified and removed initially? or by now? as well as all the other toxic sites, prion etc, on and in spike to be replicated by means of Mrna? Is the person who gets shot protected from some toxic spike sites so long as the Mrna generated spike is in the "2P mutation", attempting to lock S1 and S2, state?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082696/pdf/main.pdf#bib40
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082696/
"A monoclonal antibody against staphylococcal enterotoxin B superantigen inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry in vitro"
SUMMARY "We recently discovered a superantigen-like motif sequentially and structurally similar to a staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) segment, near the S1/S2 cleavage site of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which might explain the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) observed in children and the cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients. We show here that an anti-SEB monoclonal antibody (mAb), 6D3, can bind this viral motif at its polybasic (PRRA) insert to inhibit infection in live virus assays."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32989130/
"Superantigenic character of an insert unique to SARS-CoV-2 spike supported by skewed TCR repertoire in patients with hyperinflammation"
"The binding epitope (my note: S1 subunit?) on S harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B"
S2 subunit toxicity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523320303065?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study
Thank You PeaceLily, ( previous comment on the "theme" posted to deNutrients - News to Use)
I Am waiting for such as the studies you linked to acknowledge and elucidate the full extent of and by which means agent Mrna "spike" also causes injury. Also waiting for the full answer to a question (referenced below) asked on the Vejon Health youtube channel in the "Are there Long Term Health Risks associated with the Spike Protein?" video - an answer showing who knew what when about the toxic nature of" spike" S1 subunit at the time of the terrible decision to choose to program agent Mrna compelled creation of "spike" for "vaccine" antigen. as well as the
Dr. Abdul Mannan Baig asked, concerning why "they" would engineer the agent Mrna to cause the cell to create the "2P mutation" ? in the created "vaccine" "spike" antigen. "frequent ACS Chemical Neuroscience contributor, Dr. Abdul Mannan Baig" may want to read the "official story" found at the ACS Chemical & Engineering News site, search "The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines" There may well be certain omissions dealing with what they knew about the especially toxic nature of the S1 spike sub-unit when it is separated from the S2 sub-unit, ( and S2 when separated from S1) hence another reason to TRY to lock the S1 and S2 spike sub-units together. I have listened to doctors describe the S1 sub-unit of the cov2 "spike", as "the most toxic protein in the world" when it is NOT bound with the S2 "spike" sub-unit referring not only to the potency of unbound S1 as a toxin but its also heretofore never before seen multi-toxic nature causing such a large number and diversity of disease. Yes, they engineered agent Mrna to "create" mutated ("2P mutation") spike by "adding two prolines - the most rigid of the 20 amino acids - to a key joint of a vaccine’s spike protein" to try to keep the S1 and S2 "spike" sub-units bound together thus in the less poisonous state. In theory, in a state of the art lab? It can work?. In a "vaccine" plant set up at "warped speed" there is - mis-manufacturing, deep cold storage and shipment required - there is degradation, injected into millions - there is breakdown of the spike, separation of the sub-units. poison? yes
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19
"These data suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein alone is sufficient to trigger a broad proteomic change in the skull marrow, meninges, and brain compared to the HA protein. The dysregulated proteins are enriched in pathways related to coronavirus disease, NETs formation, and neutrophil degranulation, consistent with the changes observed in virus-infected human samples. Our data also suggest that spike S1 protein circulation in the blood would be an important trigger of COVID-19-related broader proteome change in the skull marrow, meninges, and brain cortex."
"The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit S1 induces COVID-19-like acute lung injury"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34156871/
"Ultrasensitive blood test detects viral protein, confirms mRNA vaccine activates robust immune response"
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/05/210526185844.htm
"The team found that 11-of-13 participants had low levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein (S1 subunit) as early as one day post-vaccination." my note: so soon "freed up", available to do damage, toxic S1 subunit
This whole covid debacle is a DoD / CIA Operation to depopulate.
They will fight tooth and nail to stop development & distribution to people of need.
5 billion people will ultimately meet their demise over the next 2-5 years.
Saving babies from inoculations should be our focus and creating regenerating families and structures to regrow our way out of this.
Otherwise, prepare for the Rapture.
As I understand it you are not just talking about the injection but also COVID damage as well?
Metformin inhibits CD47 signalling
The same pathway that Pfizer and Trillium are looking onto for cancer treatments.
The spike is the result of cell death, not the cause.
Treat the elimination of the lipids which slow down bloodflow especially in organs.
If you don't believe me, there's a control experiment of cultures done by Stefan Lanka that shows that even without "virus" the toxic ingredients, the result is identical to the one with virus.
See image here
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcccde14d-bff0-45d0-93f9-4967fde4ccc1_894x500.jpeg
More information here
https://viroliegy.com/2022/12/19/virologys-lack-of-control/
I am not very familiar ..but missing p53 and Line 1. Any info ?
Forgive my frustration Walter, but the idea that:
1.) the same pharma companies, medical entities, global opportunists and government tyrants that brought the populace this virus and the vaxxine would now be interested in assisting the affected populace,
and
2.) the same (above) would stand to benefit financially, yet again, in providing these therapeutic agents to the same populace that they caused the phenomenon in,
is beyond belief.
I’ve been in contact with multiple people who took Ledifos, and are now back to normal. They had to order from India. It’s cheap there, and the price of a car in the states.