Walter, forgive my ignorance, as I have no bio training and have been reading your sub-stack enthusiastically for the past couple months, trying to learn and absorb as best I can. I have noticed a marked refocus on the actual C19 virus in your focus of concern, as opposed to the gene therapy "vaccinations." In fact I've seen the same attention paid to the virus, as of late, with Igor Chudov as well (the two of you are my fave bio-investigators).
What I'm hearing from both of you on the virus is starting to really concern me, especially since my wife, both kids, and I had Omicron back in January. We are all vaxx-free, and the immediate external effects at the time were relatively mild. Stupidly, I only had enough Ivermectin on hand at the time to dose my wife and I, and not my children...we did so only because the higher risk of our age groups over our children (at least as we understood at the time). I'm now regretting that decision and thinking (in light of all you have revealed lately) that my kids would have been better off getting the IVM.
All this time I thought, so long as we didn't get the vaxx, and could fight of the infection if we ever got it, then we'd be set with good immunity and no worries about the side effects of the vaxx. In other words my fear was always about the vaxx, and not so much the virus since we're a quite healthy family. Now, from the tone of what I'm hearing, the virus may even be the bigger danger long term.
I know you've mentioned the vaccine as a spike accelerator, so it would at least partially calm my nerves if I knew we'd be way worse off if we were vaccinated. It's just that right now, I'm thinking I was looking in the wrong direction the whole time. Are you able to at least comment on where you are striking the danger balance of probabilities between the virus itself and the vaccine. Is it the virus after-all that is the real danger, notwithstanding the additional complications of ADE and the like?
Thanks for all your hard work, Walter! You are an amazing person.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK. A "HY COO" FOR YOU. FEW DIE FROM COVID - MANY TORTURED AND MURDERED - BY FAILURE TO TREAT Depraved-heart murder - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In United States law, depraved-heart murder, also known as depraved-indifference murder, is a type of murder where an individual acts with a "depraved indifference" to human life and where such act results in a death, despite that individual not explicitly intending to kill. In a depraved-heart murder, defendants commit an act even though they know their act runs an unusually high risk of causing death or serious bodily harm to a person. If the risk of death or bodily harm is great enough, ignoring it demonstrates a "depraved indifference" to human life and the resulting death is considered to have been committed with malice aforethought.[1][2] In some states, depraved-heart killings constitute second-degree murder,[3] while in others, the act would be charged with "wanton murder,"[4][5] varying degrees of manslaughter,[6] or third-degree murder. If no death results, such an act would generally constitute reckless endangerment (sometimes known as "culpable negligence") and possibly other crimes, such as assault.
Walter, forgive my ignorance, as I have no bio training and have been reading your sub-stack enthusiastically for the past couple months, trying to learn and absorb as best I can. I have noticed a marked refocus on the actual C19 virus in your focus of concern, as opposed to the gene therapy "vaccinations." In fact I've seen the same attention paid to the virus, as of late, with Igor Chudov as well (the two of you are my fave bio-investigators).
What I'm hearing from both of you on the virus is starting to really concern me, especially since my wife, both kids, and I had Omicron back in January. We are all vaxx-free, and the immediate external effects at the time were relatively mild. Stupidly, I only had enough Ivermectin on hand at the time to dose my wife and I, and not my children...we did so only because the higher risk of our age groups over our children (at least as we understood at the time). I'm now regretting that decision and thinking (in light of all you have revealed lately) that my kids would have been better off getting the IVM.
All this time I thought, so long as we didn't get the vaxx, and could fight of the infection if we ever got it, then we'd be set with good immunity and no worries about the side effects of the vaxx. In other words my fear was always about the vaxx, and not so much the virus since we're a quite healthy family. Now, from the tone of what I'm hearing, the virus may even be the bigger danger long term.
I know you've mentioned the vaccine as a spike accelerator, so it would at least partially calm my nerves if I knew we'd be way worse off if we were vaccinated. It's just that right now, I'm thinking I was looking in the wrong direction the whole time. Are you able to at least comment on where you are striking the danger balance of probabilities between the virus itself and the vaccine. Is it the virus after-all that is the real danger, notwithstanding the additional complications of ADE and the like?
Thanks for all your hard work, Walter! You are an amazing person.
Kaz
This looks promising: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8309081B2/en
Primarily a combination of chelator and proteolytic enzyme, along with things that strengthen blood vessels and recruit white blood cells.
Here's a commercial product that uses arnica, IP6, and bromelain: https://www.scarguard.com/products/bruise-fader
THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK. A "HY COO" FOR YOU. FEW DIE FROM COVID - MANY TORTURED AND MURDERED - BY FAILURE TO TREAT Depraved-heart murder - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In United States law, depraved-heart murder, also known as depraved-indifference murder, is a type of murder where an individual acts with a "depraved indifference" to human life and where such act results in a death, despite that individual not explicitly intending to kill. In a depraved-heart murder, defendants commit an act even though they know their act runs an unusually high risk of causing death or serious bodily harm to a person. If the risk of death or bodily harm is great enough, ignoring it demonstrates a "depraved indifference" to human life and the resulting death is considered to have been committed with malice aforethought.[1][2] In some states, depraved-heart killings constitute second-degree murder,[3] while in others, the act would be charged with "wanton murder,"[4][5] varying degrees of manslaughter,[6] or third-degree murder. If no death results, such an act would generally constitute reckless endangerment (sometimes known as "culpable negligence") and possibly other crimes, such as assault.
Thank you!