Most of this is GIGO. Look at the "Methods" section in Kesler et al in the post above.
Look at the dates of the study. Convince yourself that they could have found 43 "control" subjects with no SARS-CoV-2 exposure from Oct., 2021. Note that they reported no "symptomatic" Covid. Without a detailed review of the paper I did not find any pro…
Most of this is GIGO. Look at the "Methods" section in Kesler et al in the post above.
Look at the dates of the study. Convince yourself that they could have found 43 "control" subjects with no SARS-CoV-2 exposure from Oct., 2021. Note that they reported no "symptomatic" Covid. Without a detailed review of the paper I did not find any prominent report of the Vaxx status of any of the subjects- this should have been explicitly detailed in the abstract.
I have come to the realisation that most of the Covid reporting is flawed and pseudoscientific, excepting that with which I agree.
It will be difficult to discern "Accelerated Aging" because there are enough premature "Sudden and Unexpected" deaths to bury the cognitive deficit in the statistics.
Most of this is GIGO. Look at the "Methods" section in Kesler et al in the post above.
Look at the dates of the study. Convince yourself that they could have found 43 "control" subjects with no SARS-CoV-2 exposure from Oct., 2021. Note that they reported no "symptomatic" Covid. Without a detailed review of the paper I did not find any prominent report of the Vaxx status of any of the subjects- this should have been explicitly detailed in the abstract.
I have come to the realisation that most of the Covid reporting is flawed and pseudoscientific, excepting that with which I agree.
It will be difficult to discern "Accelerated Aging" because there are enough premature "Sudden and Unexpected" deaths to bury the cognitive deficit in the statistics.