I had a slight dry cough and inflamed toes in March of '20 but when I search for "Covid Toes" I only find people joking about it, articles saying it was just in peoples heads, or because they were barefoot more at home it caused foot problems. I wonder if anyone took it seriously as a sign of damage vascular endothelial cells.
It did look similar to chilblains which I'm prone to. I have poor circulation in my fingers and toes. I never had a dry cough like that and it wasn't very cold in March. I believe I had Covid in March of 2020.
There is evidence that vitamin D regulates the immune system and could inhibit the cytokine storm. The combo of vit D and curcumin has some vascular activity, although if this activity is beneficial in this context is an open question.
Here are some references for this question
Active vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 infections: review
Curcumin to inhibit binding of spike glycoprotein to ACE2 receptors: computational modelling, simulations, and ADMET studies to explore curcuminoids against novel SARS-CoV-2 targets
PS ironic how Ralph Baric started with a gastro bug and applied GoF to get it targeting lungs, heart, etc. and now here we are full circle back to the gut.
I wish all of us to have a freedom to express that sort of thoughts, Greg. Unfortunately we can rely only on our own understanding, and the topic is tough... How it would be nice to have a trusted smart doctor somewhere couple of blocks away...
Thanks Walter! And a fascinating discussion....really.
My hunch is that all of the concerns expressed in this stack by these geniuses are valid: the cabal’s style more resembles death by a thousand cuts than any one lethal measure. The nervous , reproductive and immune systems seem to be their favorite targets...oh...and our genetics. Well, blood too. Don’t most all of the ingredients probably damage the body in ways that are both diverse and obtuse?
Favor: My young friend and has a rare condition (MoyaMoya) which is probably the result of inflammation of the endothelial cells. She had lotsa strokes right after she was a vegetarian cheerleader and then had successful brain surgery at Stanford. (Amazing hospital!) While she has no debilitating long-term damage she did have covid and is sometimes dizzy. Who knows if the dizziness is related to the ro? (No jabs.). Neither her liver nor her heart are causing the dizziness. Next she is going to ask to see a neurologist.
Any suggestions for how to make endothelial cells happy?
Interesting, I had seen parallels between COVID and MoyaMoya. You can find the post on my website. As for treatments, unfortunately I cannot answer those questions, as I am not an MD. As I have often said, once I believe I fully understand the disease, then I will start theorizing about treatments. As non-medical advice, I believe trials of beta-hydroxybutyrate should be initiated and could be very effective.
I got vertigo about 6 months after initial Covid infection. Had to go to the doctor to have the "seasick table" experience followed by 3 days in a neck brace to keep me from turning my head to get over it. I've never had it before or since. My husband has had several bouts of it in the last 20 years, and he had it bad while he had Covid.
👌👍👍 Agree 100% with the Melatonin recommendation, and 10mg is on the very low side when you look at the leading and longest literature, and especially given the LD50 (caveat-only my opinion, not medical advice, blah, blah blah). Megaspore is an excellent product (again personal opinion only) but reality- probiotics are pretty pointless (even aggravating), if the gap junctions (GJ) are compromised, which specifically in C19 case they are, and then add in individuals already existing GJ degradation before spike got to town or even any other substances. People are coming at this forwards, think backwards....😊
10mg melatonin is the minimum effective dose. i would depending on individual and severity, etc. up it to 2x or even 3x for certain duration then taper back to 10mg.
The particular megaspore i suggest is very unique and not a common probiotic at all; there is serious research by company founder on how and why this product works to rebuild the gut and increase immune health greatly.
Re the melatonin - dosage and results is purely dependent on age. Dr Russel Reiter's work in the melatonin field is superb and hes yet to find the LD50. I think hes gone as high as 100mg so far. Id stagger the intake because its eliminated after 45-50mins. For those healthy under 60, as James Black commented above- make your own if you can in the infrared light hours of morning and evening, via your skin, uncovered best but IR does penetrate through clothing, roughly 8cm. Then you'll get the other benefits as well.
Re megaspore I assume you mean Kiran Krishanan? He's awesome and did a great job on Megaspores range. But a leaky boat wont hold anything if the seals are damaged. Plug the holes first, then fill the boat. 😊
It is graphene toxicity poisoning with all the outcomes that come from toxicity such as physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. Those are causing blood clots, organ failure, strokes, and many other injuries, including death. Graphene can result in acute inflammation response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of important organs. Studies regarding risks of graphene in the brain show that graphene application leads to harmful effects on brain tissue development and the atypical ultrastructure was observed in the brain. Graphene demonstrates its toxicity in the central nervous system and toxicity in reproduction and development system. In the animal studies the pregnant mice had abortions at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when the high dose was injected during late gestation and the development of offspring was delayed during the lactation period. The high dose reduces milk production and postpones the growth of offspring. The developmental toxicity of graphene induces structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioral and functional abnormalities, and even death. Graphene induces the lung injury with inflammatory cell infiltration, pulmonary edema and granuloma formation in the lungs. Graphene causes cytotoxic effects and mitochondrial injury, leads to inflammations, induces DNA damage, decreases cell adhesion and induces cell apoptosis - cell death. Graphene inserts between the base pairs of double-stranded DNA and disturb the flow of genetic information at the molecular level, which is the main cause of its mutagenic effect. It is hemotoxic, cytotoxic, cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, harmful to reproductive system. Graphene sharpened edges cause physical destruction... Graphene oxide causes oxidative stress and acute oxidative stress causes blood clots, but graphene is also cardiotoxic and acute oxidative stress (free radicals) causes organs failure, autoimmune diseases, rashes and allergies, mess up with immune system, etc. The key word is OXIDATIVE STRESS caused by graphene toxicity/cytotoxicity.
There are other toxic ingredients and heavy metals in those vials, that we already know about, such as cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)), rare earth metals such as cerium (Ce) and gadolinium (Gd), barium (Ba), cesium (Cs), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) have already been found by researchers. There is also toxic PEG! All of them will result in oxidative stress or acute oxidative stress.
Prove it is a BS - because I can easily prove it is graphene - Spike protein is irrelevant people do not die of Spike Protein, but they do DIE and get INJURED from toxicity of graphene
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Common mechanisms of cytotoxicity of G nanosheets have been reported in literature on
different cell types, and include the physical interaction with cell membranes (Seabra et
al., 2014); disruption of cell cytoskeleton (Tian et al., 2017); oxidative stress due to
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Chen M. et al., 2016; Mittal et al., 2016);
mitochondrial damage (Pelin et al., 2017); DNA damage, such as chromosomal
fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations and oxidative DNA alterations
(Akhavan et al., 2012; Fahmi et al., 2017); autophagy (Chen et al., 2014); and apoptosis
and/or necrosis ... . It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
Sona Nanotech is a nanotechnology life sciences firm that has developed multiple proprietary methods for the manufacture of various types of gold nanoparticles.
Nitriles are very well known to chemists. They are very reactive molecules and very often toxic. They are used in the chemical industry to produce insecticides, pesticides, strong detergents to materials that are difficult to remove, such as metals.
Nitriles are cyanide compounds. This class of compounds is characterized by the presence of C≡N (cyan) and includes cyanides and nitriles (R-C≡N), as well as related compounds. chemical compounds such as cyanogens, isocyanates and cyanamides. They owe their owe their toxicity primarily to the cyanide ion, which, when released into the body, is capable of inhibiting many enzymes, especially cytochrome oxidase. Death, which occurs more or less quickly depending on the rate of cyanide ion release, is the result of chemical asphyxiation at the cellular level.), PEG, chemtrails and other toxic materials introduced in many ways, including 5G that causes oxidative stress too.
We are being poisoned, if people get cold or flu they can die IF they are venerable or poisoned already.
If graphene is USED first look what graphene does, later look at the "virus"
Check out Kevin McCairn's work. He found no graphene in the vaccine using scanning electron microscopy. He found samples without phosphorous too. So, no graphene...or mRNA.
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Common mechanisms of cytotoxicity of G nanosheets have been reported in literature on
different cell types, and include the physical interaction with cell membranes (Seabra et
al., 2014); disruption of cell cytoskeleton (Tian et al., 2017); oxidative stress due to
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Chen M. et al., 2016; Mittal et al., 2016);
mitochondrial damage (Pelin et al., 2017); DNA damage, such as chromosomal
fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations and oxidative DNA alterations
(Akhavan et al., 2012; Fahmi et al., 2017); autophagy (Chen et al., 2014); and apoptosis
and/or necrosis ... . It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
Sona Nanotech is a nanotechnology life sciences firm that has developed multiple proprietary methods for the manufacture of various types of gold nanoparticles.
First of all, the guy opinion is expressing just an opinion on methods and possible outcome, IT IS NOT a SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION of the vials that are INJECTED
Graphene is certainly used in masks and in PCR tests - and in sorts of food and drugs:
Researchers discover that once graphene enters the lungs the immune system has trouble getting rid of it. Graphene nanoplatelets can penetrate deeper into the lungs than their size would
suggest, say UK researchers. And once there, the body’s natural defences cannot deal with them effectively. Chronic exposure could therefore lead to inflammation and disease in a similar way to asbestos fibres. Same for so the called "tests" that are inserted close to brain instead lungs... This is NOT SCIENCE.
Secondly, this NANOTECHNOLOGY has been ALREADY USED in Hospira - and Hospira is the "saline solution" used by Pfizer for diluting those vials of C-19 "vaccine":
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
Btw., this protein aggregation is actually a huge problem = amyloid plaque formations.
considering that Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Italian Constitution is in root not
applicable, even if we want to disregard the violation of the rule of law, precisely
because of the lack of benefits for the community
in fact, having noted that Article 32 of the 'personocentric' constitutional charter after
the experience of Nazi-fascism does not permit medical experimentation that is
invasive of the person without his free and informed consent
whereas informed consent is not conceivable when the components of the serums and
the mechanism of their operation are, as in this case, covered not only by industrial
secrecy but also, incomprehensibly, by
'MILITARY' SECRECY
whereas, therefore, after two years we still do not know the components of the
serums nor their medium and long-term effects as written by the manufacturers
themselves, whereas we know that in the short term they have already caused
thousands of deaths and serious adverse events in view of the fact that Article 32 of the Italian Constitution and, consistently, the various international conventions signed by Italy prohibit the imposition of medical treatment without the consent of the person concerned because his or her DIGNITY would be infringed, a value underpinning the many provisions of our rigid
Constitution and substantiating Article 1 of the Constitution (not surprisingly) of
Germany considering that consent must be free and informed and in this case Dr. ... does not
legitimately intend to give i
Shedding is one of perfect examples GRAPHENE IS ONE OF THE UNDECLARED ingredients:
Shedding:
GRAPHENE SHEDDING AND RUFFLING:
Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Stimulate Ruffling and Shedding of Mammalian Cell Plasma
It is a technology, AND IT IS NOT just graphene, those are also other ingredients, such as those found by researchers - and also UV light (UV light and temperature influence growth of these nano structures):
Controlling self-assembly of nanocomposites is a fundamental challenge with exciting implications for next-generation advanced functional materials. Precursors for composites can be generated photochemically, but limited insight in the underlying processes has hindered precise hands-on guidance. In this study, light-controlled nucleation and growth is demonstrated for self-assembling composites according to precise user-defined designs. Carbonate is generated photochemically with UV light to steer the precipitation of nanocomposites of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica (BaCO3/SiO2). Using a custom-built optical setup, the self-assembly process is controlled by optimizing the photogeneration, diffusion, reaction, and precipitation of the carbonate species, using the radius and intensity of the UV-light irradiated area and reaction temperature. Exploiting this control, nucleation is induced and the contours and individual features of the growing composite are sculpted according to micrometer-defined light patterns. Moreover, moving light patterns are exploited to create a constant carbonate concentration at the growth front to draw lines of nanocomposites with constant width over millimeters with micrometer precision. Light-directed generation of local gradients opens previously unimaginable opportunities for guiding self-assembly into functional materials.
In their experiments, the researchers tried firing near-field radiation at sample human proteins and found that and fibrils present would emit a dim, near-infrared signal. This was important, because unlike UV light, near-field radiation can penetrate relatively deeply into tissue.
Graphene is NOT THE ONLY INGREDIENT, but IT IS THERE
Of course! I am not criticizing WMC research. All the research moves us further - I think WMC and Jessica's research on amyloids - Cardiac Amyloidosis (and not just Myocarditis being the reason for cardiac problems) is extremely important and great!
However, people are under Spike spell - I was too. It took me 7-8 months of day and night research to understand that virus is irrelevant.
If certain technology has been used (and is used) that causes the exact outcome that we see, we have to consider this technology first.
Covid is a misdiagnosed disease. But HOW the people, the doctors could know we have been so widely poisoned?
The problem is we HAVE BEEN and this is the outcome. This is why this is not a virus.
And yes, people who are poisoned, are susceptive to infections and those infections, as additional oxidative stress - and hardship for their already struggling organism, may be lethal for them.
There was a simple experiment done with two groups of mouses - one group was healthy and one was poisoned by fumes.
You can imagine the outcome for those two groups when they became sick with some kind of flu, you can understand which group recovered and which died or was very ill.
yes i have run into michael yeadon, and dr. lee merritt discussing the No virus theory which makes you wonder since there are 169000 published studies in pubmed, unless all these hunderds thousands of people are wrong?
You have to respect others as well. you made your point, there is no need to post ten messages on same thing. you might want to start your own substack too.
You are disrespectful to me, now to "michael yeadon, and that woman merrill somebody" - What's your purpose? Virus police? More shutting people's mouth? Silencing them?
I started my career sitting in front of microscopes and SEM's doing microanalysis of particles found in semiconductor manufacturing. I have seen NOTHING that convinces me that there is any systematic contamination or purposeful addition of graphene or graphene oxide to the vials. I will argue until I am blue in the face that nanothermite was used to bring down building 7... that's because of the evidence stack that includes SEM/EDX fingerprinting of the particles found in the dust, as well as DSC proof of the exotherm. Most people have no sense of what they are seeing in world of microanalysis and microcontamination... think about all those dust particles you see when the beam of sunlight is shining in just right... that is the unseen world. In the case of the vials, there will be particles of various contaminants.. machine wear, shedding and sloughing of filters, etc. A few stray particles does not a story tell.
That is interesting, and it potentially adds to the stack of evidence suggesting that one of the modes of damage being inflicted by the mRNA transfections is micro-clotting/endothelial damage. This micro-clotting does not show up in normal imaging. I would have to see more baseline data from non-injected people though to know that these thermal images are not just showing the temperature differentials associated with normal blood flow.
BTW, I thought your NAC post in Walter's newer article was very helpful.. and you only mentioned graphene once : )
View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna (ijvtpr.com)
Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)
There were 94% of the total sample whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation.
This all overlaps and it utterly shocking!
Regarding NAC and other antioxidants: I have closest people severely injured by those injections. They would not be alive if we wouldn't know what we do now. My heart is broken because of what I see, and I know. Those antioxidants do work but the damage that is being done, is very hard to undo. But yes, it is possible, though, to reverse it; I have a firsthand experience. I've seen them recovering, returning to life. Day by day I've been observing the change. I've been using Ivermectin too, when possible, but more and more NAC the more I read.
I read also about detox, fasting on juices, using certain clays and baths - but I still think NAC and other antioxidants are crucial.
I asked some of those researchers to do more studies on the blood after using them, I hope they will be able to show the effect under microscope.
Controlling self-assembly of nanocomposites is a fundamental challenge with exciting implications for next-generation advanced functional materials. Precursors for composites can be generated photochemically, but limited insight in the underlying processes has hindered precise hands-on guidance. In this study, light-controlled nucleation and growth is demonstrated for self-assembling composites according to precise user-defined designs. Carbonate is generated photochemically with UV light to steer the precipitation of nanocomposites of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica (BaCO3/SiO2). Using a custom-built optical setup, the self-assembly process is controlled by optimizing the photogeneration, diffusion, reaction, and precipitation of the carbonate species, using the radius and intensity of the UV-light irradiated area and reaction temperature. Exploiting this control, nucleation is induced and the contours and individual features of the growing composite are sculpted according to micrometer-defined light patterns. Moreover, moving light patterns are exploited to create a constant carbonate concentration at the growth front to draw lines of nanocomposites with constant width over millimeters with micrometer precision. Light-directed generation of local gradients opens previously unimaginable opportunities for guiding self-assembly into functional materials.
In their experiments, the researchers tried firing near-field radiation at sample human proteins and found that and fibrils present would emit a dim, near-infrared signal. This was important, because unlike UV light, near-field radiation can penetrate relatively deeply into tissue.
Precise control over biotic and abiotic self-assembly processes is of fundamental interest with practical impact for simple and scalable routes toward complex 3D architectures with advanced functionalities.[1-8] A simple and highly versatile bioinspired self-assembly process is the co-precipitation of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica into nanocomposites (BaCO3/SiO2).[9-15] In short, carbonate ions trigger the precipitation of BaCO3, which in turn causes the polymerization of SiO2 in an acid-regulated feedback loop. This coprecipitation can yield a wide diversity of 3D shapes such as corals, vases, and helices. Already, post-synthesis functionalization and ion-exchange reactions of such architectures have enabled shape-preserving conversion into chemical compositions with photovoltaic, magnetic, and catalytic performance.[16-23] Moreover, rudimental patterning and shaping of these composites has been demonstrated by modulating the reaction conditions either dynamically and globally, or statically and locally, leading to similar shapes, but not yet following exact user-defined designs. Unlocking the full potential of this self-assembly approach will require the ability to control chemical gradients both dynamically and locally—instead of statically and globally—for precisely guiding both nucleation and growth to guide assembly according to user-defined designs.
From this perspective, photochemical reactions offer attractive possibilities for modulating local gradients.[7, 23, 24] Specifically, the photochemical generation of carbonate via photodecarboxylation of ketoprofen (KP) can onset precipitation of BaCO3/SiO2 composites,[24] but precise control over nucleation and growth, let alone assembly according to user-defined designs, is not possible yet. In particular, it remains unclear how the intricate interplay between photogenerated precursors, crystallization, reaction, and diffusion processes affect self-assembly.
Based on fundamental insights in the roles of reaction and diffusion rates, we here study the spatiotemporal photogeneration of carbonate for light-controlled nucleation and growth of BaCO3/SiO2 composites. By controlling reaction temperature, light intensity, and other crystallization conditions such as surface free energies, we position single composites in preassigned locations, sculpt fine details and contours, and command the assembly of lines over millimeters with micrometer precision, thus introducing assembly with unprecedented spatiotemporal control.
Look, please, at figure 4 B...
In those injections also was found: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)), rare earth metals such as cerium (Ce) and gadolinium (Gd), barium (Ba), cesium (Cs), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca
And those UV lights, purple lights are popping everywhere...
This shows the technology, that is used. UV light and temperature influence the self-assembling / growing of those structures
And WMC research is crucial, because all those works move us forward to understanding what's going on, especially I love his work on amyloids, this is really crucial for those shots - this allows us to understand why certain used medications - that we see working in practice - work from the scientific point of view.
We are not only talking about injections. Graphene is also used in so many other ways, it is toxic. Its toxicity is TIME AND DOSE dependent. Small dose can be highly toxic after a long time.
You're in LALA LAND - why don't you join one of many groups that do the real analyses, not be satisfied with your previous experience.
Currently, NMs are widely used in many aspects of our lives, and thus, our risk of exposure to NMs has increased. NPs can enter the body through several different routes and produce toxicity in different systems, including the reproductive system. NPs have been shown to detrimentally affect the reproductive systems of mice in vivo and in vitro. At the cellular level, NPs can induce infertility by altering the activity, morphology, quality, and quantity of sperm. In female reproductive cells, NPs can disturb primary and secondary follicle development, causing irregular cell arrangement and a shapeless follicular antrum. In addition, NPs can impact Leydig cell viability, proliferation, and gene expression. The toxicity of NPs is
DOSE AND SIZE
dependent, and for some NPs, the core structure and surface chemistry are also important. On the organ level, NPs can deposit in the OVARY and TESTIS, leading to weight decreases of the testis and epididymis and changes in the testis seminiferous tubule morphometry.)
A significant concentration and TIME DEPENDENT decrease in cell viability was observed at different concentrations (10–100 μg/ml) by the MTT assay after 24 and 48 h of exposure and significant increase of early and late apoptotic cells was observed as compared to control cells. Our study demonstrates that GO INDUCES CYTOTOXICITY AND APOPTOSIS IN HUMAN LUNG CELLS.
- What do you find in those masks? And WHY toxic GRAPHENE is USED??? Inhaled???
- What do you find in those PCR tests ? (that strangely enough are done towards your brain not your lungs - while in some countries it is forbidden BY LAW to do this kind of interventions by unqualified professionals)
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain, nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.
How to Reach the Brain: It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
4492 Order SND/351/2020, of April 16, authorizing the Armed Forces NBC Units and the Military Emergency Unit to use biocides authorized by the Ministry of Health in the disinfection
to deal with the health crisis caused by COVID-19.
Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14, declaring a state of alarm for the management of the crisis situation caused by COVID-19 ...
For the effective fulfillment of these measures, the competent delegated authorities may require the action of the Armed Forces, in accordance with the provisions of article 15.3 of the
Article 15.3 of Organic Law 5/2005, of November 17, 2005, on National Defense.
In the field of the containment of the spread of the coronavirus, special attention is required to
disinfection of facilities such as residential social centers, hospitals and other health centers.
residential social centers, hospitals and other health centers, penitentiary establishments
and other health centers, penitentiary establishments, traffic management centers and transport hubs. The Armed Forces are carrying out these tasks as one of their priority tasks.
The Ministry of Health has been publishing and updating the list of biocides to be used against the new coronavirus, which are authorized and registered in Spain in accordance with the
UNE-EN 14476, which evaluates the virucidal capacity of antiseptics and chemical disinfectants.
chemical disinfectants. In particular, due to their special efficacy, some biocides are specified as follows biocides established in the main group 1 of article 1.1 of Royal Decree 830/2010,
of 25 June, which establishes the regulations governing the training to carry out treatments with biocides. Among the most effective disinfection techniques are the use of aerial means, since, through aerial means because through them, with nebulization, thermonebulization and micronebulization techniques, it is possible to reach techniques, all surfaces can be reached quickly, avoiding the need to depend on manual application, which is slower and sometimes does not reach all surfaces due to obstacles that prevent them from being reached.
The NBC defense units of the Armed Forces and the Military Emergency Unit (UME) have the following Emergencies (UME) have at their disposal personnel, materials, procedures, and the
OFFICIAL STATE BULLETIN
No. 107 Friday, April 17, 2020 Sec. I. Page 29198 cve: BOE-A-2020-4492
Verifiable at https://www.boe.es sufficient training to carry out aerial disinfections, as they are operations that are regularly performed, except that instead of using biocidal products, they use other biocidal products, they use other decontaminating chemical products. It is for this reason
In view of the above, and in order to improve and speed up disinfection operations in all types of
disinfection of all types of facilities that the personnel of the Armed Forces have been carrying out, it is considered convenient to authorize, on an exceptional basis and for the duration of the state of alarm, to the NBC Defense Units of the Armed Forces and the UME, the use of the disinfectants and biocides ...
First. Authorization to the NBQ Units of the Armed Forces and the Military Emergency Unit to use
Military Emergency Unit to use biocides authorized by the Ministry of Health. ...
Likewise, the units mentioned in the previous paragraph are authorized to use aerial disinfection procedures, which are of aerial disinfection procedures, through the techniques of nebulization, thermonebulization and micronebulization, techniques for the execution of the aforementioned disinfection tasks. etc.
Madrid, April 16, 2020.-The Minister of Health, Salvador Illa Roca.
OFFICIAL STATE BULLETIN No. 107 Friday, April 17, 2020 Sec. I. Page 29199
We have designed and synthesized a 3-dimensional reduced graphene oxide (3D-rGO) and silica dioxide (SiO2) nanocomposite material. In this composite, SiO2 can enhance the overall water molecule adsorption capabilities of the composite and enable less aggregation of the overall 3D-rGO structure, thus leading to more available sites for ice nucleation, whereas 3D-rGO acts as templates for ice crystal growth due to its hexagonal lattice structure, with the ability to dissipate the latent heat produced by ice condensation rapidly.
Look, you unfortunately still do not understand WHY this is all done - it is to establish nanotechnology for blockchain, transhumanism, human augmentation, for telemedicine, control, sterilization, depopulation, etc. I have posted enough arguments to understand toxicity of graphene and the fact that we so not just talk about those injections, but also masks, tests, chemtrails, flu vaccines, many drugs, even food, saline solution, etc.
More importantly who is behind and why _ this is Maccination, not vaccination it is biosensor, a CHIP
I am not going to argue with people claiming something. We have plenty of evidence by now from international sources from all over the world. People can believe what they want.
Nanoparticles are widely used in electronics, aeronautics, energy, agriculture, cosmetics, medicine, textile production, and many other fields. They are currently used to administer drugs, proteins, genes, vaccines, polypeptides, and nucleic acids
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
Are researchers at least studying that? That seems like something that someone should be working on an answer to ... no?
And thanks, btw.
I am living with a person who got jabbed 2x, but promises no boosters. I am wondering do I have to still be concerned about spike proteins shedding from them? ...and for how long?
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna (ijvtpr.com)
Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)
It is all done for blockchain, this is technology - they KNOW jabbing babies has no epidemiological sense - but people must have digital ID with blockchain technology, this is the entire military secret
this is why amyloidosis form - oxidative stress and graphene and temperature and UV light, this is just technology that is injected - people need to understand who and why - or they can dwell on divagations regarding researchers
"The eye sees only the the mind is prepared to comprehend." ~ Jefferson Davies. Thank you Walter and many of the commentators - for helping me comprehend, and see truthfulness.
A wonderful mentor taught me the true brilliance & understanding is reflected in the ability to simplify to the point an average person can grasp the basics and you do it in spades. Not that most of the real science detail doesn't evaporate by the minute but following the plot and key actors your biological story unfolds in a clear way. The discussion threads a priceless bonus for all. :~)
A reference detour to keep under your incredibly open minded hat for transition to diet and metabolism.. longtime tracker of Monsanto/Rockefeller/Gates GMO/CRISPR/Pharmer networks..
Of all the gmo varieties possible health effects the most concerning is Bt variety that produces pesticide from every cell of the plant, thus EPA "regulated" under guidelines for applied pesticides. Anyway it works by eating through the soft tissue of the corn borers stomach lining & obviously years of this gmo corn as a dietary staple looks like acid reflux as a best case.. What looks like it may inspire novel thinking by you is how they explain its potential targeting cancer.. what might it be doing now in tummies from birth w gmo soy formula to old age same gmo soy Ensure?
For now you have a bigger mystery but food for thought when this case wraps!
Claims of FDA safety & oversight mirror Pfizer FOIA.. rubber stamping corp studies is a very long tradition in Washington.. revolving door leadership fast tracks the process...
1994 - Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
Plants modified to express insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (referred to as Bt-protected plants) provide a safe and highly effective method of insect control. Bt-protected corn, cotton, and potato were introduced into the United States in 1995/1996 and grown on a total of approximately 10 million acres in 1997, 20 million acres in 1998, and 29 million acres globally in 1999. The extremely rapid adoption of these Bt-protected crops demonstrates the outstanding grower satisfaction of the performance and value of these products.
These crops provide highly effective control of major insect pests such as the European corn borer, southwestern corn borer, tobacco budworm, cotton bollworm, pink bollworm, and Colorado potato beetle and reduce reliance on conventional chemical pesticides. They have provided notably higher yields in cotton and corn. The estimated total net savings to the grower using Bt-protected cotton in the United States was approximately $92 million in 1998.
Other benefits of these crops include reduced levels of the fungal toxin fumonisin in corn and the opportunity for supplemental pest control by beneficial insects due to the reduced use of broad-spectrum insecticides. Insect resistance management plans are being implemented to ensure the prolonged effectiveness of these products.
**Extensive testing of Bt-protected crops has been conducted which establishes the safety of these products to humans, animals, and the environment.** Acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicology studies conducted over the past 40 years establish the safety of the microbial Bt products, including their expressed insecticidal (Cry) proteins, which are fully approved for marketing.
Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review
Another promising field is the potential for Bt proteins to act against cancer cells. Parasporins, toxins of Bt that do not have an entomopathogenic effect, have a cytotoxic effect on the cells changed by some cancers. This demonstrates the potential of the microorganism and new opportunities opening for future applications. https://web.archive.org/web/20220822182708/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25264571/
Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus biopesticides production
The long residual action and toxicity of the chemical insecticides have brought about serious environmental problems such as the emergence and spread of insecticide resistance in many species of vectors, mammalian toxicity, and accumulation of pesticide residues in the food chain. All these problems have highlighted the need for alternative biological control agents. Entomo-pathogenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Bacillus sphaericus (Bs) are two safe biological control agents. They have attracted considerable interest as possible replacements for the chemical insecticides. Although microbial insecticides based on Bt and Bs are available for use, their high cost makes large-scale application impracticable in developing countries. This review focuses on the economic production of these two microorganisms by submerged fermentation and solid state fermentation using agro-industrial by-products and other wastes. <<----
"We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache. "
The greatest fear people have is dying from this disease. A vaccine must significantly or entirely reduce deaths from Covid-19. Over two hundred thousand people have died in the United States and nearly a million worldwide. None list mortality as a critical endpoint.
Interim analysis success requires a seventy percent efficacy. The vaccine or placebo will be given to thousands of people in each trial. For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms, which may be mild, in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group.
Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group. For Johnson & Johnson, their interim analysis includes 77 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 18 or less developing symptoms compared to 59 in the control group. For AstraZeneca, their interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 12 or less developing symptoms compared to 19 in the 25 person control group. Pfizer is even smaller in its success requirements. Their initial group includes 32 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 7 or less developing symptoms compared to 25 in the control group.
The primary analyses are a bit more expanded, but need to be less efficacious for success: about sixty percent. AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer have primary analyses that distribute the vaccine to only 100, 151, 154, and 164 participants respectively. These companies state that they do not “intend” to stop trials after the primary analyses, but there is every chance that they intend to pursue an EUA and focus on manufacturing the vaccine rather than further thorough testing.
The second surprise from these protocols is how mild the requirements for contracted Covid-19 symptoms are. A careful reading reveals that the minimum qualification for a case of Covid-19 is a positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms. These include headache, fever, cough, or mild nausea. This is far from adequate. These vaccine trials are testing to prevent common cold symptoms.
These trials certainly do not give assurance that the vaccine will protect from the serious consequences of Covid-19. Johnson & Johnson is the only trial that requires the inclusion of severe Covid-19 cases, at least 5 for the 75 participant interim analysis.
One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus? These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of Covid-19, and not infections themselves. Asymptomatic infection is listed as a secondary objective in these trials when they should be of critical importance.
It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation.
A greater concern for the millions of older people and those with preexisting conditions is whether these trials test the vaccine's ability to prevent severe illness and death. Again we find that severe illness and death are only secondary objectives in these trials. None list the prevention of death and hospitalization as a critically important barrier.
If total infections, hospitalizations, and death are going to be ignored in the preliminary trials of the vaccines, then there must be phase four testing to monitor their safety and efficacy. This would be long term massive scale monitoring of the vaccine. There must be an indication that the authorized vaccines are reducing infection, hospitalization, and death, or else they will not be able to stop this pandemic.
These protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of Covid-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death. It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success.
It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success. As this is being written, the FDA is poised to announce tougher standards for a Covid-19 vaccine in the near future. It is my hope that these new standards for an EUA will at a minimum include requirements for protections from infection itself, protections from severe virus-related disease leading to hospitalization, and a significant improvement in Covid-19 related mortality.
It is clear from these studies that the vaccines currently under trial will not be the silver bullet needed to end the pandemic. We must do all we can public health measures to control Covid-19 as China and other Asian countries have successfully done."
And the funny thing about this is, if you know your medical textbooks, it was clear from the beginning when they started talking about "Covid Toes".
I had a slight dry cough and inflamed toes in March of '20 but when I search for "Covid Toes" I only find people joking about it, articles saying it was just in peoples heads, or because they were barefoot more at home it caused foot problems. I wonder if anyone took it seriously as a sign of damage vascular endothelial cells.
Narrow perspectives have a tendency to attribute medical symptoms to imagination: consider it a reverse diagnostic of the speaker.
Compare an image search for 'Covid Toes' and one for 'Chilblains', caused by microvascular disturbance, as Walter is discussing here.
It did look similar to chilblains which I'm prone to. I have poor circulation in my fingers and toes. I never had a dry cough like that and it wasn't very cold in March. I believe I had Covid in March of 2020.
I think "COVID toes" were more associated with the J&J vax. I could be mistaken, though.
Speaking of penises, they've got microvasculature also:
https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/on-the-subject-of-vaccine-toxicities
You have to look at the mitochondria. They are the uncertainty that the spike is still produced after the mRNA is degraded.
Your research, map making and map elucidation are a profound blessing to me, Walter!
Thank You!
Thanks, Jerome!
Is there any research that acknowledges these mechanisms and tries to search for potential treatments?
I conjecture without proof, that vitamin D and curcumin could play a positive role in all this shitfest.
There is evidence that vitamin D regulates the immune system and could inhibit the cytokine storm. The combo of vit D and curcumin has some vascular activity, although if this activity is beneficial in this context is an open question.
Here are some references for this question
Active vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 infections: review
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33409846/
Micronutrients and bioactive substances: Their potential roles in combating COVID-19
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33450678/
Curcumin to inhibit binding of spike glycoprotein to ACE2 receptors: computational modelling, simulations, and ADMET studies to explore curcuminoids against novel SARS-CoV-2 targets
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35520671/
PS ironic how Ralph Baric started with a gastro bug and applied GoF to get it targeting lungs, heart, etc. and now here we are full circle back to the gut.
I wish I better understood this.
Yeah. I'm with you. It's tough. Hanging on by my fingernails! LOL! Going to read this one again tomorrow. || long sigh ||
I wish all of us to have a freedom to express that sort of thoughts, Greg. Unfortunately we can rely only on our own understanding, and the topic is tough... How it would be nice to have a trusted smart doctor somewhere couple of blocks away...
What's sad is most doctors could not see the damage to one's lymphocytes the vaccines would cause. Hello. Wasn't that obvious on day one?
Thanks Walter! And a fascinating discussion....really.
My hunch is that all of the concerns expressed in this stack by these geniuses are valid: the cabal’s style more resembles death by a thousand cuts than any one lethal measure. The nervous , reproductive and immune systems seem to be their favorite targets...oh...and our genetics. Well, blood too. Don’t most all of the ingredients probably damage the body in ways that are both diverse and obtuse?
Favor: My young friend and has a rare condition (MoyaMoya) which is probably the result of inflammation of the endothelial cells. She had lotsa strokes right after she was a vegetarian cheerleader and then had successful brain surgery at Stanford. (Amazing hospital!) While she has no debilitating long-term damage she did have covid and is sometimes dizzy. Who knows if the dizziness is related to the ro? (No jabs.). Neither her liver nor her heart are causing the dizziness. Next she is going to ask to see a neurologist.
Any suggestions for how to make endothelial cells happy?
Interesting, I had seen parallels between COVID and MoyaMoya. You can find the post on my website. As for treatments, unfortunately I cannot answer those questions, as I am not an MD. As I have often said, once I believe I fully understand the disease, then I will start theorizing about treatments. As non-medical advice, I believe trials of beta-hydroxybutyrate should be initiated and could be very effective.
I will look for the post you mentioned. Thanks!
I got vertigo about 6 months after initial Covid infection. Had to go to the doctor to have the "seasick table" experience followed by 3 days in a neck brace to keep me from turning my head to get over it. I've never had it before or since. My husband has had several bouts of it in the last 20 years, and he had it bad while he had Covid.
For all GI issues related and unrelated to covid, start administering this:
https://microbiomelabs.com/home/products/megasporebiotic/
Add 10mg real melatonin which rebuilds lining and is powerful antioxidant.
There is a more involved protocol to repair gastric issues, but these two supplements are the foundation.
Also consider this: www.virex.health
👌👍👍 Agree 100% with the Melatonin recommendation, and 10mg is on the very low side when you look at the leading and longest literature, and especially given the LD50 (caveat-only my opinion, not medical advice, blah, blah blah). Megaspore is an excellent product (again personal opinion only) but reality- probiotics are pretty pointless (even aggravating), if the gap junctions (GJ) are compromised, which specifically in C19 case they are, and then add in individuals already existing GJ degradation before spike got to town or even any other substances. People are coming at this forwards, think backwards....😊
Or better yet, pure mitochondria produced Melatonin production where it is needed from 2 hrs of no sunscreen sunlight on exposed body.
Correct
You can feel the cellular mitochondria produced Melatonin kick in at about the 1 hr duration in the sun.
After 2 hrs, priceless.
10mg melatonin is the minimum effective dose. i would depending on individual and severity, etc. up it to 2x or even 3x for certain duration then taper back to 10mg.
The particular megaspore i suggest is very unique and not a common probiotic at all; there is serious research by company founder on how and why this product works to rebuild the gut and increase immune health greatly.
Re the melatonin - dosage and results is purely dependent on age. Dr Russel Reiter's work in the melatonin field is superb and hes yet to find the LD50. I think hes gone as high as 100mg so far. Id stagger the intake because its eliminated after 45-50mins. For those healthy under 60, as James Black commented above- make your own if you can in the infrared light hours of morning and evening, via your skin, uncovered best but IR does penetrate through clothing, roughly 8cm. Then you'll get the other benefits as well.
Re megaspore I assume you mean Kiran Krishanan? He's awesome and did a great job on Megaspores range. But a leaky boat wont hold anything if the seals are damaged. Plug the holes first, then fill the boat. 😊
Great suggestions. Thanks.
The interaction of IDO1 and the mitochondria is the problem.
It is graphene toxicity poisoning with all the outcomes that come from toxicity such as physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. Those are causing blood clots, organ failure, strokes, and many other injuries, including death. Graphene can result in acute inflammation response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of important organs. Studies regarding risks of graphene in the brain show that graphene application leads to harmful effects on brain tissue development and the atypical ultrastructure was observed in the brain. Graphene demonstrates its toxicity in the central nervous system and toxicity in reproduction and development system. In the animal studies the pregnant mice had abortions at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when the high dose was injected during late gestation and the development of offspring was delayed during the lactation period. The high dose reduces milk production and postpones the growth of offspring. The developmental toxicity of graphene induces structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioral and functional abnormalities, and even death. Graphene induces the lung injury with inflammatory cell infiltration, pulmonary edema and granuloma formation in the lungs. Graphene causes cytotoxic effects and mitochondrial injury, leads to inflammations, induces DNA damage, decreases cell adhesion and induces cell apoptosis - cell death. Graphene inserts between the base pairs of double-stranded DNA and disturb the flow of genetic information at the molecular level, which is the main cause of its mutagenic effect. It is hemotoxic, cytotoxic, cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, harmful to reproductive system. Graphene sharpened edges cause physical destruction... Graphene oxide causes oxidative stress and acute oxidative stress causes blood clots, but graphene is also cardiotoxic and acute oxidative stress (free radicals) causes organs failure, autoimmune diseases, rashes and allergies, mess up with immune system, etc. The key word is OXIDATIVE STRESS caused by graphene toxicity/cytotoxicity.
There are other toxic ingredients and heavy metals in those vials, that we already know about, such as cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)), rare earth metals such as cerium (Ce) and gadolinium (Gd), barium (Ba), cesium (Cs), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) have already been found by researchers. There is also toxic PEG! All of them will result in oxidative stress or acute oxidative stress.
pls stop spreading bs. go play somewhere else.
Prove it is a BS - because I can easily prove it is graphene - Spike protein is irrelevant people do not die of Spike Protein, but they do DIE and get INJURED from toxicity of graphene
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/27/deadly-virus-bioweapon-or-damp-squib/
Animals that had "Spike Protein" just had a flu, no organ damage and other outcomes from "Spike"
This is nanotechnology that crosses all blood barriers, is toxic, causes oxidative stress and injures/kills people.
Why do you think GRAPHENE ISUSED everywhere??? Is this NORMAL? Not according to the science.
If you drink poison, why your liver needs a transplant? Because of flu? Or a virus?
https://www.google.com/search?q=masks+graphene&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiautiry9f5AhWaEGIAHcESBgoQ_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1067&bih=526&dpr=1.5
PCR:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012/full - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Common mechanisms of cytotoxicity of G nanosheets have been reported in literature on
different cell types, and include the physical interaction with cell membranes (Seabra et
al., 2014); disruption of cell cytoskeleton (Tian et al., 2017); oxidative stress due to
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Chen M. et al., 2016; Mittal et al., 2016);
mitochondrial damage (Pelin et al., 2017); DNA damage, such as chromosomal
fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations and oxidative DNA alterations
(Akhavan et al., 2012; Fahmi et al., 2017); autophagy (Chen et al., 2014); and apoptosis
and/or necrosis ... . It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://www.medgadget.com/2021/06/graphene-sensor-for-rapid-covid-19-detection.html
https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/sona-nanotech-withdraws-rapid-covid-19-antigen-test-application-based-on-feedback
Sona Nanotech is a nanotechnology life sciences firm that has developed multiple proprietary methods for the manufacture of various types of gold nanoparticles.
https://phys.org/news/2020-08-graphene-oxide-based-rapid-infections.html
https://www.biospace.com/article/new-graphene-chemo-phononic-test-for-sars-cov-2-may-challenge-pcr-assays/
https://www.grapheneuses.org/graphene-sensor/
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/national-cybersecurity-center-partners-with-id2020-alliance/
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/trust-over-ip-digital-identity-consortium-ibm-r3-mastercard/
https://blockchainmagazine.net/us-firm-integrates-nanotechnology-blockchain-for-covid-19-immunity-passports/
https://dailycoin.com/nano-nano-could-lead-mastercards-crypto-development/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c05075
Nanoparticles are widely used in electronics, aeronautics, energy, agriculture, cosmetics,
medicine, textile production, and many other fields. They are currently used to administer
drugs, proteins, genes, vaccines, polypeptides, and nucleic acids
Shedding:
GRAPHENE SHEDDING AND RUFFLING:
Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Stimulate Ruffling and Shedding of Mammalian Cell Plasma
Membranes https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120764/ Published in final edited form as: Chem. 2016 Aug 11; 1(2): 273–286.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.06.019
Pfizer documents - Clinical protocol (Pages 67-69):
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
Etc. THIS IS GRAPHENE plus ethylene oxide, toxic remdesivir - (Veklury© or remdesivir is an altrononitrile. Remdesivir is a nitrile. More specifically, an altrononitrile. It is described by its IUPAC name: lalanine, N-((S)-hydroxyphenoxyphosphinyl)-, 2-ethylbutyl ester, 6-ester of 2-C-(4- aminopyrrolo(2,1-f)(1,2,4)triazin-7-yl)-2,5-anhydro-d-altronitrile.
Nitriles are very well known to chemists. They are very reactive molecules and very often toxic. They are used in the chemical industry to produce insecticides, pesticides, strong detergents to materials that are difficult to remove, such as metals.
Nitriles are cyanide compounds. This class of compounds is characterized by the presence of C≡N (cyan) and includes cyanides and nitriles (R-C≡N), as well as related compounds. chemical compounds such as cyanogens, isocyanates and cyanamides. They owe their owe their toxicity primarily to the cyanide ion, which, when released into the body, is capable of inhibiting many enzymes, especially cytochrome oxidase. Death, which occurs more or less quickly depending on the rate of cyanide ion release, is the result of chemical asphyxiation at the cellular level.), PEG, chemtrails and other toxic materials introduced in many ways, including 5G that causes oxidative stress too.
We are being poisoned, if people get cold or flu they can die IF they are venerable or poisoned already.
If graphene is USED first look what graphene does, later look at the "virus"
Check out Kevin McCairn's work. He found no graphene in the vaccine using scanning electron microscopy. He found samples without phosphorous too. So, no graphene...or mRNA.
did he check Hospira saline solution for diluting vials?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309756855_Microparticles_and_Nanoparticles_Delivered_in_Intravenous_Saline_and_in_an_Intravenous_Solution_of_a_Therapeutic_Antibody_Product (this protein aggregation is actually a huge problem = amyloid plaque formations)
HOSPIRA is the saline solution used by Pfizer:
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
did he check masks ?
https://www.google.com/search?q=mask+graphene&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjM8qTM5dn5AhV6ElkFHfjsA1IQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=mask+graphene&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQARgAMgUIABCABDIGCAAQHhAFMgYIABAeEAUyBggAEB4QBTIGCAAQHhAIMgYIABAeEAgyBggAEB4QCDIGCAAQHhAIMgYIABAeEAgyBggAEB4QCDoECAAQQzoECAAQHjoHCAAQsQMQQzoICAAQgAQQsQM6CAgAELEDEIMBOgYIABAKEBg6BAgAEBg6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBUJQNWM0_YJ1TaANwAHgAgAGHAYgBhBGSAQQwLjE3mAEAoAEBqgELZ3dzLXdpei1pbWe4AQPAAQE&sclient=img&ei=lx4DY4zLFvqk5NoP-NmPkAU&bih=526&biw=1067
did he check PCR ?
PCR:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012/full - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Common mechanisms of cytotoxicity of G nanosheets have been reported in literature on
different cell types, and include the physical interaction with cell membranes (Seabra et
al., 2014); disruption of cell cytoskeleton (Tian et al., 2017); oxidative stress due to
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Chen M. et al., 2016; Mittal et al., 2016);
mitochondrial damage (Pelin et al., 2017); DNA damage, such as chromosomal
fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations and oxidative DNA alterations
(Akhavan et al., 2012; Fahmi et al., 2017); autophagy (Chen et al., 2014); and apoptosis
and/or necrosis ... . It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://www.medgadget.com/2021/06/graphene-sensor-for-rapid-covid-19-detection.html
https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/sona-nanotech-withdraws-rapid-covid-19-antigen-test-application-based-on-feedback
Sona Nanotech is a nanotechnology life sciences firm that has developed multiple proprietary methods for the manufacture of various types of gold nanoparticles.
https://phys.org/news/2020-08-graphene-oxide-based-rapid-infections.html
https://www.biospace.com/article/new-graphene-chemo-phononic-test-for-sars-cov-2-may-challenge-pcr-assays/
https://www.grapheneuses.org/graphene-sensor/
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676
Now the nitriles.....there is an interesting discussion....cross reference your air pollution research and you'll find some interesting effects.🤔😉
yes, it is all well thought - and UV light that is popping suddenly on our streets helps those nano-peptide structures to grow
It would have to be actually in there in the first place, wouldn't it...
This guy doesn't seem to be the average "fact checker" dummie/asshole.
https://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2022/02/no-a-recent-report-has-not-found-graphene-in-covid-vaccines-3006681.html
This should be not US trying to find out, it should be THEM coming out with a full list of used ingredients
First of all, the guy opinion is expressing just an opinion on methods and possible outcome, IT IS NOT a SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION of the vials that are INJECTED
Graphene is certainly used in masks and in PCR tests - and in sorts of food and drugs:
(Biomass Graphene 3 Ply Non-woven Graphene Face Mask China Manufacturer (archive.org), (http://web.archive.org/web/20200804115842/https://bsg-i.nbxc.com/product/77/9c/aa/9362cb7afe5f374fc952f25859.jpg), Reputation well non-woven Biomass Graphene disposable 3 ply Face Mask earloop for kids , https://recalls-rappels.canada.ca/en/alert-recall/graphene-face-masks , http://web.archive.org/web/20210404000450/https://www.kamloopsthisweek.com/health-canada-recalls-masks-containing-graphene-as-it-assesses-risks-to-people-1.24302799 , https://cn.tradekey.com/product_view/Disposable-Graphene-Face-Mask-3ply-Earloop-Mask-Wholesale-9403187.html , http://hdreporter.com/health/9646-are-graphene-coated-face-masks-a-covid-19-miracle-or-another-health-risk , https://www.hsmsearch.com/Graphene-enhanced-face-masks , https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/py/c6py00639f/unauth ETC. - ALL "masks" contain graphene - this is called "Professional exposure" and it is toxic, harmful, could be lethal).
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/graphene-slips-deeper-into-lungs-than-predicted/3001864.article
Researchers discover that once graphene enters the lungs the immune system has trouble getting rid of it. Graphene nanoplatelets can penetrate deeper into the lungs than their size would
suggest, say UK researchers. And once there, the body’s natural defences cannot deal with them effectively. Chronic exposure could therefore lead to inflammation and disease in a similar way to asbestos fibres. Same for so the called "tests" that are inserted close to brain instead lungs... This is NOT SCIENCE.
Secondly, this NANOTECHNOLOGY has been ALREADY USED in Hospira - and Hospira is the "saline solution" used by Pfizer for diluting those vials of C-19 "vaccine":
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/hospira-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-one-lot-sterile-water-injection-usp-due-potential
This article is from 2016:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309756855_Microparticles_and_Nanoparticles_Delivered_in_Intravenous_Saline_and_in_an_Intravenous_Solution_of_a_Therapeutic_Antibody_Product
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
Btw., this protein aggregation is actually a huge problem = amyloid plaque formations.
https://www.alltherisks.com/trade-secret
The full list of ingredients is A MILITARY SECRET according to EMA:
https://twitter.com/TheRadicalShow/status/1548719934884253699
https://truthcomestolight.com/historic-decision-against-mandatory-vaccination-by-italian-court-judge-declares-in-her-decision-that-covid-vaccines-are-producing-very-serious-adverse-effects-thousands-of-deaths/
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Tribunal-Firenze-06072022_EN.pdf
From the court decision:
considering that Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Italian Constitution is in root not
applicable, even if we want to disregard the violation of the rule of law, precisely
because of the lack of benefits for the community
in fact, having noted that Article 32 of the 'personocentric' constitutional charter after
the experience of Nazi-fascism does not permit medical experimentation that is
invasive of the person without his free and informed consent
whereas informed consent is not conceivable when the components of the serums and
the mechanism of their operation are, as in this case, covered not only by industrial
secrecy but also, incomprehensibly, by
'MILITARY' SECRECY
whereas, therefore, after two years we still do not know the components of the
serums nor their medium and long-term effects as written by the manufacturers
themselves, whereas we know that in the short term they have already caused
thousands of deaths and serious adverse events in view of the fact that Article 32 of the Italian Constitution and, consistently, the various international conventions signed by Italy prohibit the imposition of medical treatment without the consent of the person concerned because his or her DIGNITY would be infringed, a value underpinning the many provisions of our rigid
Constitution and substantiating Article 1 of the Constitution (not surprisingly) of
Germany considering that consent must be free and informed and in this case Dr. ... does not
legitimately intend to give i
Shedding is one of perfect examples GRAPHENE IS ONE OF THE UNDECLARED ingredients:
Shedding:
GRAPHENE SHEDDING AND RUFFLING:
Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Stimulate Ruffling and Shedding of Mammalian Cell Plasma
Membranes https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120764/ Published in final edited form as: Chem. 2016 Aug 11; 1(2): 273–286.
doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.06.019
Pfizer documents - Clinical protocol (Pages 67-69):
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
It is a technology, AND IT IS NOT just graphene, those are also other ingredients, such as those found by researchers - and also UV light (UV light and temperature influence growth of these nano structures):
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.202107843
Abstract
Controlling self-assembly of nanocomposites is a fundamental challenge with exciting implications for next-generation advanced functional materials. Precursors for composites can be generated photochemically, but limited insight in the underlying processes has hindered precise hands-on guidance. In this study, light-controlled nucleation and growth is demonstrated for self-assembling composites according to precise user-defined designs. Carbonate is generated photochemically with UV light to steer the precipitation of nanocomposites of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica (BaCO3/SiO2). Using a custom-built optical setup, the self-assembly process is controlled by optimizing the photogeneration, diffusion, reaction, and precipitation of the carbonate species, using the radius and intensity of the UV-light irradiated area and reaction temperature. Exploiting this control, nucleation is induced and the contours and individual features of the growing composite are sculpted according to micrometer-defined light patterns. Moreover, moving light patterns are exploited to create a constant carbonate concentration at the growth front to draw lines of nanocomposites with constant width over millimeters with micrometer precision. Light-directed generation of local gradients opens previously unimaginable opportunities for guiding self-assembly into functional materials.
In their experiments, the researchers tried firing near-field radiation at sample human proteins and found that and fibrils present would emit a dim, near-infrared signal. This was important, because unlike UV light, near-field radiation can penetrate relatively deeply into tissue.
Graphene is NOT THE ONLY INGREDIENT, but IT IS THERE
And btw. if someone posts a research, we must stay silent and accept it or is there a room for arguments and discussion?
Or are you a censor? A fact checker based on your opinions?
i have respect and am thankful for the work of WMC.
Of course! I am not criticizing WMC research. All the research moves us further - I think WMC and Jessica's research on amyloids - Cardiac Amyloidosis (and not just Myocarditis being the reason for cardiac problems) is extremely important and great!
However, people are under Spike spell - I was too. It took me 7-8 months of day and night research to understand that virus is irrelevant.
If certain technology has been used (and is used) that causes the exact outcome that we see, we have to consider this technology first.
This is why those researchers are right:
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/27/deadly-virus-bioweapon-or-damp-squib/
Covid is a misdiagnosed disease. But HOW the people, the doctors could know we have been so widely poisoned?
The problem is we HAVE BEEN and this is the outcome. This is why this is not a virus.
And yes, people who are poisoned, are susceptive to infections and those infections, as additional oxidative stress - and hardship for their already struggling organism, may be lethal for them.
There was a simple experiment done with two groups of mouses - one group was healthy and one was poisoned by fumes.
You can imagine the outcome for those two groups when they became sick with some kind of flu, you can understand which group recovered and which died or was very ill.
yes i have run into michael yeadon, and dr. lee merritt discussing the No virus theory which makes you wonder since there are 169000 published studies in pubmed, unless all these hunderds thousands of people are wrong?
You have to respect others as well. you made your point, there is no need to post ten messages on same thing. you might want to start your own substack too.
You are disrespectful to me, now to "michael yeadon, and that woman merrill somebody" - What's your purpose? Virus police? More shutting people's mouth? Silencing them?
Many independent researchers didn't find any graphene in the jabs
Even if jabs contain graphene, they are minuscule amounts that won't cause harm (poison is in the dose)
RNA on the other hand is proven to generate several GRAMS of toxic spike protein.
I started my career sitting in front of microscopes and SEM's doing microanalysis of particles found in semiconductor manufacturing. I have seen NOTHING that convinces me that there is any systematic contamination or purposeful addition of graphene or graphene oxide to the vials. I will argue until I am blue in the face that nanothermite was used to bring down building 7... that's because of the evidence stack that includes SEM/EDX fingerprinting of the particles found in the dust, as well as DSC proof of the exotherm. Most people have no sense of what they are seeing in world of microanalysis and microcontamination... think about all those dust particles you see when the beam of sunlight is shining in just right... that is the unseen world. In the case of the vials, there will be particles of various contaminants.. machine wear, shedding and sloughing of filters, etc. A few stray particles does not a story tell.
So what would you say about this?
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/computerized-thermographic-imaging?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://rumble.com/v1gzhzh-computerized-thermographic-imaging-and-live-blood-analysis-post-c19-injecti.html
That is interesting, and it potentially adds to the stack of evidence suggesting that one of the modes of damage being inflicted by the mRNA transfections is micro-clotting/endothelial damage. This micro-clotting does not show up in normal imaging. I would have to see more baseline data from non-injected people though to know that these thermal images are not just showing the temperature differentials associated with normal blood flow.
BTW, I thought your NAC post in Walter's newer article was very helpful.. and you only mentioned graphene once : )
And did I send this one to you?
View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna (ijvtpr.com)
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80
Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-8594
Riccardo Benzi Cipelli (0000-0003-3030-8594) (orcid.org)
There were 94% of the total sample whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation.
This all overlaps and it utterly shocking!
Regarding NAC and other antioxidants: I have closest people severely injured by those injections. They would not be alive if we wouldn't know what we do now. My heart is broken because of what I see, and I know. Those antioxidants do work but the damage that is being done, is very hard to undo. But yes, it is possible, though, to reverse it; I have a firsthand experience. I've seen them recovering, returning to life. Day by day I've been observing the change. I've been using Ivermectin too, when possible, but more and more NAC the more I read.
I read also about detox, fasting on juices, using certain clays and baths - but I still think NAC and other antioxidants are crucial.
I asked some of those researchers to do more studies on the blood after using them, I hope they will be able to show the effect under microscope.
This is also important:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.202107843
Abstract
Controlling self-assembly of nanocomposites is a fundamental challenge with exciting implications for next-generation advanced functional materials. Precursors for composites can be generated photochemically, but limited insight in the underlying processes has hindered precise hands-on guidance. In this study, light-controlled nucleation and growth is demonstrated for self-assembling composites according to precise user-defined designs. Carbonate is generated photochemically with UV light to steer the precipitation of nanocomposites of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica (BaCO3/SiO2). Using a custom-built optical setup, the self-assembly process is controlled by optimizing the photogeneration, diffusion, reaction, and precipitation of the carbonate species, using the radius and intensity of the UV-light irradiated area and reaction temperature. Exploiting this control, nucleation is induced and the contours and individual features of the growing composite are sculpted according to micrometer-defined light patterns. Moreover, moving light patterns are exploited to create a constant carbonate concentration at the growth front to draw lines of nanocomposites with constant width over millimeters with micrometer precision. Light-directed generation of local gradients opens previously unimaginable opportunities for guiding self-assembly into functional materials.
In their experiments, the researchers tried firing near-field radiation at sample human proteins and found that and fibrils present would emit a dim, near-infrared signal. This was important, because unlike UV light, near-field radiation can penetrate relatively deeply into tissue.
Precise control over biotic and abiotic self-assembly processes is of fundamental interest with practical impact for simple and scalable routes toward complex 3D architectures with advanced functionalities.[1-8] A simple and highly versatile bioinspired self-assembly process is the co-precipitation of barium carbonate nanocrystals and amorphous silica into nanocomposites (BaCO3/SiO2).[9-15] In short, carbonate ions trigger the precipitation of BaCO3, which in turn causes the polymerization of SiO2 in an acid-regulated feedback loop. This coprecipitation can yield a wide diversity of 3D shapes such as corals, vases, and helices. Already, post-synthesis functionalization and ion-exchange reactions of such architectures have enabled shape-preserving conversion into chemical compositions with photovoltaic, magnetic, and catalytic performance.[16-23] Moreover, rudimental patterning and shaping of these composites has been demonstrated by modulating the reaction conditions either dynamically and globally, or statically and locally, leading to similar shapes, but not yet following exact user-defined designs. Unlocking the full potential of this self-assembly approach will require the ability to control chemical gradients both dynamically and locally—instead of statically and globally—for precisely guiding both nucleation and growth to guide assembly according to user-defined designs.
From this perspective, photochemical reactions offer attractive possibilities for modulating local gradients.[7, 23, 24] Specifically, the photochemical generation of carbonate via photodecarboxylation of ketoprofen (KP) can onset precipitation of BaCO3/SiO2 composites,[24] but precise control over nucleation and growth, let alone assembly according to user-defined designs, is not possible yet. In particular, it remains unclear how the intricate interplay between photogenerated precursors, crystallization, reaction, and diffusion processes affect self-assembly.
Based on fundamental insights in the roles of reaction and diffusion rates, we here study the spatiotemporal photogeneration of carbonate for light-controlled nucleation and growth of BaCO3/SiO2 composites. By controlling reaction temperature, light intensity, and other crystallization conditions such as surface free energies, we position single composites in preassigned locations, sculpt fine details and contours, and command the assembly of lines over millimeters with micrometer precision, thus introducing assembly with unprecedented spatiotemporal control.
Look, please, at figure 4 B...
In those injections also was found: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)), rare earth metals such as cerium (Ce) and gadolinium (Gd), barium (Ba), cesium (Cs), aluminum (Al), silicon (Si), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca
And those UV lights, purple lights are popping everywhere...
https://www.instructables.com/Intelligent-Street-Light-Using-LoRa/ This prototype works on Master-slave configuration, where each street light acts as slave, and LoRa Gateway acts as the master. (https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/local/2022/02/08/why-some-streelights-appear-purple-northeastern-and-central-wisconsin/9225015002/ , https://www.wfla.com/news/local-news/why-are-some-street-lights-in-tampa-tinted-purple-teco-explains/ , https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/purple-street-lights-apple-valley/ , http://www.abilene-rc.com/news/some-abilene-streetlights-have-turned-purple-here-is-evergy-s-explanation-for-the-color-change/article_d5f55584-58ff-11ec-ab8d-bb745a683c80.html )
This shows the technology, that is used. UV light and temperature influence the self-assembling / growing of those structures
And WMC research is crucial, because all those works move us forward to understanding what's going on, especially I love his work on amyloids, this is really crucial for those shots - this allows us to understand why certain used medications - that we see working in practice - work from the scientific point of view.
We are not only talking about injections. Graphene is also used in so many other ways, it is toxic. Its toxicity is TIME AND DOSE dependent. Small dose can be highly toxic after a long time.
You're in LALA LAND - why don't you join one of many groups that do the real analyses, not be satisfied with your previous experience.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294055/ Conclusion
Currently, NMs are widely used in many aspects of our lives, and thus, our risk of exposure to NMs has increased. NPs can enter the body through several different routes and produce toxicity in different systems, including the reproductive system. NPs have been shown to detrimentally affect the reproductive systems of mice in vivo and in vitro. At the cellular level, NPs can induce infertility by altering the activity, morphology, quality, and quantity of sperm. In female reproductive cells, NPs can disturb primary and secondary follicle development, causing irregular cell arrangement and a shapeless follicular antrum. In addition, NPs can impact Leydig cell viability, proliferation, and gene expression. The toxicity of NPs is
DOSE AND SIZE
dependent, and for some NPs, the core structure and surface chemistry are also important. On the organ level, NPs can deposit in the OVARY and TESTIS, leading to weight decreases of the testis and epididymis and changes in the testis seminiferous tubule morphometry.)
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.01206/full
A significant concentration and TIME DEPENDENT decrease in cell viability was observed at different concentrations (10–100 μg/ml) by the MTT assay after 24 and 48 h of exposure and significant increase of early and late apoptotic cells was observed as compared to control cells. Our study demonstrates that GO INDUCES CYTOTOXICITY AND APOPTOSIS IN HUMAN LUNG CELLS.
- What do you find in those masks? And WHY toxic GRAPHENE is USED??? Inhaled???
https://www.google.com/search?q=masks+graphene&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirhI-x9Nn5AhXLFFkFHcCaDt8Q_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1067&bih=526&dpr=1.5
- What do you find in those PCR tests ? (that strangely enough are done towards your brain not your lungs - while in some countries it is forbidden BY LAW to do this kind of interventions by unqualified professionals)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain, nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012/full - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells
How to Reach the Brain: It is clear, however, that G nanosheets may cause adverse environmental and health effects, leaving open the debate about their use as biomedical platform
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://www.medgadget.com/2021/06/graphene-sensor-for-rapid-covid-19-detection.html
https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/sona-nanotech-withdraws-rapid-covid-19-antigen-test-application-based-on-feedback
https://phys.org/news/2020-08-graphene-oxide-based-rapid-infections.html
https://www.biospace.com/article/new-graphene-chemo-phononic-test-for-sars-cov-2-may-challenge-pcr-assays/
https://www.grapheneuses.org/graphene-sensor/
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676
- What do you see in Hospira and
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/hospira-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-one-lot-sterile-water-injection-usp-due-potential
- What do you see in flu vaccines?
https://www.fiercepharma.com/vaccines/deaths-rattle-south-korea-s-seasonal-flu-vaccination-but-authority-presses-ahead-free
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/nanoparticle-based-flu-vaccine
What do you find in chemtrails that have been using biocide? CAN YOU SPECIFY WHAT BIOCIDE HAS BEEN USED?
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-09-spanish-government-admits-spraying-chemtrails-on-citizens.html I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
4492 Order SND/351/2020, of April 16, authorizing the Armed Forces NBC Units and the Military Emergency Unit to use biocides authorized by the Ministry of Health in the disinfection
to deal with the health crisis caused by COVID-19.
Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14, declaring a state of alarm for the management of the crisis situation caused by COVID-19 ...
For the effective fulfillment of these measures, the competent delegated authorities may require the action of the Armed Forces, in accordance with the provisions of article 15.3 of the
Article 15.3 of Organic Law 5/2005, of November 17, 2005, on National Defense.
In the field of the containment of the spread of the coronavirus, special attention is required to
disinfection of facilities such as residential social centers, hospitals and other health centers.
residential social centers, hospitals and other health centers, penitentiary establishments
and other health centers, penitentiary establishments, traffic management centers and transport hubs. The Armed Forces are carrying out these tasks as one of their priority tasks.
The Ministry of Health has been publishing and updating the list of biocides to be used against the new coronavirus, which are authorized and registered in Spain in accordance with the
UNE-EN 14476, which evaluates the virucidal capacity of antiseptics and chemical disinfectants.
chemical disinfectants. In particular, due to their special efficacy, some biocides are specified as follows biocides established in the main group 1 of article 1.1 of Royal Decree 830/2010,
of 25 June, which establishes the regulations governing the training to carry out treatments with biocides. Among the most effective disinfection techniques are the use of aerial means, since, through aerial means because through them, with nebulization, thermonebulization and micronebulization techniques, it is possible to reach techniques, all surfaces can be reached quickly, avoiding the need to depend on manual application, which is slower and sometimes does not reach all surfaces due to obstacles that prevent them from being reached.
The NBC defense units of the Armed Forces and the Military Emergency Unit (UME) have the following Emergencies (UME) have at their disposal personnel, materials, procedures, and the
OFFICIAL STATE BULLETIN
No. 107 Friday, April 17, 2020 Sec. I. Page 29198 cve: BOE-A-2020-4492
Verifiable at https://www.boe.es sufficient training to carry out aerial disinfections, as they are operations that are regularly performed, except that instead of using biocidal products, they use other biocidal products, they use other decontaminating chemical products. It is for this reason
In view of the above, and in order to improve and speed up disinfection operations in all types of
disinfection of all types of facilities that the personnel of the Armed Forces have been carrying out, it is considered convenient to authorize, on an exceptional basis and for the duration of the state of alarm, to the NBC Defense Units of the Armed Forces and the UME, the use of the disinfectants and biocides ...
First. Authorization to the NBQ Units of the Armed Forces and the Military Emergency Unit to use
Military Emergency Unit to use biocides authorized by the Ministry of Health. ...
Likewise, the units mentioned in the previous paragraph are authorized to use aerial disinfection procedures, which are of aerial disinfection procedures, through the techniques of nebulization, thermonebulization and micronebulization, techniques for the execution of the aforementioned disinfection tasks. etc.
Madrid, April 16, 2020.-The Minister of Health, Salvador Illa Roca.
OFFICIAL STATE BULLETIN No. 107 Friday, April 17, 2020 Sec. I. Page 29199
Graphene is used as a BIOCIDE and in chemtrails.
https://www.uaerep.ae/resources/final-report-prof-linda-zou.pdf
We have designed and synthesized a 3-dimensional reduced graphene oxide (3D-rGO) and silica dioxide (SiO2) nanocomposite material. In this composite, SiO2 can enhance the overall water molecule adsorption capabilities of the composite and enable less aggregation of the overall 3D-rGO structure, thus leading to more available sites for ice nucleation, whereas 3D-rGO acts as templates for ice crystal growth due to its hexagonal lattice structure, with the ability to dissipate the latent heat produced by ice condensation rapidly.
https://www.carbon-waters.com/graphene-a-superb-biocidal-agent/ -
https://www.versarien.com/files/5916/3707/5814/Development_of_graphene_and_nanoparticle-based_anti-microbials.pdf & https://www.graphene-info.com/how-can-graphene-assist-war-coronavirus & https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/03/08/2188871/0/en/Ceylon-Graphite-Files-Patent-for-Newly-Developed-Biocidal-Nanocomposite-Surface-Coating-Material.html
Look, you unfortunately still do not understand WHY this is all done - it is to establish nanotechnology for blockchain, transhumanism, human augmentation, for telemedicine, control, sterilization, depopulation, etc. I have posted enough arguments to understand toxicity of graphene and the fact that we so not just talk about those injections, but also masks, tests, chemtrails, flu vaccines, many drugs, even food, saline solution, etc.
More importantly who is behind and why _ this is Maccination, not vaccination it is biosensor, a CHIP
I am not going to argue with people claiming something. We have plenty of evidence by now from international sources from all over the world. People can believe what they want.
CORONA VIRUS ... https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58861-8_2 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9298084 DCCORONA
https://projects.ics.forth.gr/_publications/CORONA2015.pdf CORONA
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.202107843
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/national-cybersecurity-center-partners-with-id2020-alliance/
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/trust-over-ip-digital-identity-consortium-ibm-r3-mastercard/
https://blockchainmagazine.net/us-firm-integrates-nanotechnology-blockchain-for-covid-19-immunity-passports/
https://dailycoin.com/nano-nano-could-lead-mastercards-crypto-development/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c05075
Nanoparticles are widely used in electronics, aeronautics, energy, agriculture, cosmetics, medicine, textile production, and many other fields. They are currently used to administer drugs, proteins, genes, vaccines, polypeptides, and nucleic acids
PCR:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.14 Per the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model of fractional depositions of inhaled particles,15 the aerodynamic diameter of an inhaled particle can influence its deposition in the pulmonary tract. Nanometer-sized particles are expected to deposit predominantly in the nasopharyngeal and laryngeal regions. Considering the anatomy of the olfactory region in the nose, which connects directly and indirectly with the brain,16 nanoparticle deposition in this region may result in nose-to-brain translocation. In support of this, epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, and animal experiments exploring the biodistribution of inhaled nanoparticles have identified the materials in extrapulmonary organs, including the brain.
Several modes of transport by which nanoparticles may enter the brain from the nasal cavities have been considered, including transport via axons of olfactory (olfactory neural pathway)31 and trigeminal (trigeminal pathway)32,33 neurons or via spaces between neuronal axons (paracellular transport).34 Other pathways include paracellular or transcellular transport in relation to olfactory sustentacular epithelial cells.16,35,36 Nanoparticles may also undergo absorption into the systemic circulation and then permeate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to access the brain.16 The latter pathway remains unlikely due to various defenses of a healthy BBB, including efflux pumps and narrow tight junctions.37,38
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012/full - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Google masks graphene images and you will see ALL "masks" contain this toxic material worse than asbestos (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23782772_Microstructures_and_Nanostructures_for_Environmental_Carbon_Nanotubes_and_Nanoparticulate_Soots)
Kind of seems silly in light of allll this scientific data but I heard graphene is in SKITTLES, the candy! Have you heard that?
yes, it is in many food products too
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41127-021-00045-5
https://www.fastcompany.com/90160784/edible-graphene-is-here-and-electronics-in-your-food-are-coming
https://nanografi.com/blog/60-uses-of-graphene/
etc.
Question: Is the generation of toxic spike protein continuous? . . . or does it stop or slow down after a while . . . . ??
study carried out by Stanford University proved that it exist at least up to 60 days, but none seems to know how long it continues.
Are researchers at least studying that? That seems like something that someone should be working on an answer to ... no?
And thanks, btw.
I am living with a person who got jabbed 2x, but promises no boosters. I am wondering do I have to still be concerned about spike proteins shedding from them? ...and for how long?
Hospira:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309756855_Microparticles_and_Nanoparticles_Delivered_in_Intravenous_Saline_and_in_an_Intravenous_Solution_of_a_Therapeutic_Antibody_Product
HOSPIRA is the saline solution used by Pfizer:
IV saline in bags manufactured by both Hospira and Baxter contained 1600-8000 microparticles/mL and 4-73 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in solution. When IV immunoglobulin was diluted into the IV saline, 3700-23,000 microparticles/mL and 18-240 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL were detected. During processing of the solution through the IV system, in-line filters removed most microparticles. However, there were still 1-21 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV saline and 7-83 × 10⁶ nanoparticles/mL in IV immunoglobulin diluted in saline.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/hospira-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-one-lot-sterile-water-injection-usp-due-potential
https://www.ohsrep.org.au/nanotechnology_-_a_new_hazard - GRAPHENE AND GRAPHENE OXIDE: A “NEW ASBESTOS”
View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna (ijvtpr.com)
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80
Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-8594
Riccardo Benzi Cipelli (0000-0003-3030-8594) (orcid.org)
It is all done for blockchain, this is technology - they KNOW jabbing babies has no epidemiological sense - but people must have digital ID with blockchain technology, this is the entire military secret
this is why amyloidosis form - oxidative stress and graphene and temperature and UV light, this is just technology that is injected - people need to understand who and why - or they can dwell on divagations regarding researchers
GRAPHENE not Spike Protein
Toxicity of graphene, acute oxidative stress
You have to look at the mitochondria. They are the uncertainty that the spike is still produced after the mRNA is degraded.
What do you mean?
Thank you, once again, Walter. Now we need a test and treatment protocol.
Working on that.
What can we do to counteract the damage? I have persistent hypertension and IBS since COVID
"The eye sees only the the mind is prepared to comprehend." ~ Jefferson Davies. Thank you Walter and many of the commentators - for helping me comprehend, and see truthfulness.
A wonderful mentor taught me the true brilliance & understanding is reflected in the ability to simplify to the point an average person can grasp the basics and you do it in spades. Not that most of the real science detail doesn't evaporate by the minute but following the plot and key actors your biological story unfolds in a clear way. The discussion threads a priceless bonus for all. :~)
A reference detour to keep under your incredibly open minded hat for transition to diet and metabolism.. longtime tracker of Monsanto/Rockefeller/Gates GMO/CRISPR/Pharmer networks..
Of all the gmo varieties possible health effects the most concerning is Bt variety that produces pesticide from every cell of the plant, thus EPA "regulated" under guidelines for applied pesticides. Anyway it works by eating through the soft tissue of the corn borers stomach lining & obviously years of this gmo corn as a dietary staple looks like acid reflux as a best case.. What looks like it may inspire novel thinking by you is how they explain its potential targeting cancer.. what might it be doing now in tummies from birth w gmo soy formula to old age same gmo soy Ensure?
For now you have a bigger mystery but food for thought when this case wraps!
Claims of FDA safety & oversight mirror Pfizer FOIA.. rubber stamping corp studies is a very long tradition in Washington.. revolving door leadership fast tracks the process...
1994 - Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
F. Owen Fields, Ph.D.
http://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;32(2):156-73. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2000.1426.
Abstract
Plants modified to express insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (referred to as Bt-protected plants) provide a safe and highly effective method of insect control. Bt-protected corn, cotton, and potato were introduced into the United States in 1995/1996 and grown on a total of approximately 10 million acres in 1997, 20 million acres in 1998, and 29 million acres globally in 1999. The extremely rapid adoption of these Bt-protected crops demonstrates the outstanding grower satisfaction of the performance and value of these products.
These crops provide highly effective control of major insect pests such as the European corn borer, southwestern corn borer, tobacco budworm, cotton bollworm, pink bollworm, and Colorado potato beetle and reduce reliance on conventional chemical pesticides. They have provided notably higher yields in cotton and corn. The estimated total net savings to the grower using Bt-protected cotton in the United States was approximately $92 million in 1998.
Other benefits of these crops include reduced levels of the fungal toxin fumonisin in corn and the opportunity for supplemental pest control by beneficial insects due to the reduced use of broad-spectrum insecticides. Insect resistance management plans are being implemented to ensure the prolonged effectiveness of these products.
**Extensive testing of Bt-protected crops has been conducted which establishes the safety of these products to humans, animals, and the environment.** Acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicology studies conducted over the past 40 years establish the safety of the microbial Bt products, including their expressed insecticidal (Cry) proteins, which are fully approved for marketing.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220807191604/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11067772/
Current US acreage Bt crops.. over 50% since 2007 over 75% since 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20220623213618/https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption/
Crit Rev Biotechnol . 2016;36(2):317-26. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.960793. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review
Another promising field is the potential for Bt proteins to act against cancer cells. Parasporins, toxins of Bt that do not have an entomopathogenic effect, have a cytotoxic effect on the cells changed by some cancers. This demonstrates the potential of the microorganism and new opportunities opening for future applications. https://web.archive.org/web/20220822182708/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25264571/
Basic Microbiol. 2006;46(2):158-70. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200510585.
Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus biopesticides production
The long residual action and toxicity of the chemical insecticides have brought about serious environmental problems such as the emergence and spread of insecticide resistance in many species of vectors, mammalian toxicity, and accumulation of pesticide residues in the food chain. All these problems have highlighted the need for alternative biological control agents. Entomo-pathogenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Bacillus sphaericus (Bs) are two safe biological control agents. They have attracted considerable interest as possible replacements for the chemical insecticides. Although microbial insecticides based on Bt and Bs are available for use, their high cost makes large-scale application impracticable in developing countries. This review focuses on the economic production of these two microorganisms by submerged fermentation and solid state fermentation using agro-industrial by-products and other wastes. <<----
https://web.archive.org/web/20220822182708/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25264571/
Here is a very good interview with Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD http://shows.zbsradio.com/20220820/a82b8e97904e4ba.mp3
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/my-interview-on-the-tom-quinn-show?utm_source=%2Fprofile%2F41754232-ana-maria-mihalcea-md-phd&utm_medium=reader2
She well nails it, and all MY RESEARCH proves she is RIGHT
Toxicity of what's used is the reason for Covid and for "vaccine" injuries - graphene is one of TOXIC the garbage used.
Spike Protein is another element of this psyop - who said Spike causes this Covid or vaccine injuries? Fauci? Wuhan lab? Moderna? Pfizer?
IT IS NOT SPIKE PROTEIN.
Those trials for the "vaccine" were never designed to prove really saving lives or prevent disease, as Forbes assumed - https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/?sh=d1dd55452479 :
"We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache. "
The greatest fear people have is dying from this disease. A vaccine must significantly or entirely reduce deaths from Covid-19. Over two hundred thousand people have died in the United States and nearly a million worldwide. None list mortality as a critical endpoint.
Interim analysis success requires a seventy percent efficacy. The vaccine or placebo will be given to thousands of people in each trial. For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms, which may be mild, in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group.
Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group. For Johnson & Johnson, their interim analysis includes 77 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 18 or less developing symptoms compared to 59 in the control group. For AstraZeneca, their interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 12 or less developing symptoms compared to 19 in the 25 person control group. Pfizer is even smaller in its success requirements. Their initial group includes 32 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 7 or less developing symptoms compared to 25 in the control group.
The primary analyses are a bit more expanded, but need to be less efficacious for success: about sixty percent. AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer have primary analyses that distribute the vaccine to only 100, 151, 154, and 164 participants respectively. These companies state that they do not “intend” to stop trials after the primary analyses, but there is every chance that they intend to pursue an EUA and focus on manufacturing the vaccine rather than further thorough testing.
The second surprise from these protocols is how mild the requirements for contracted Covid-19 symptoms are. A careful reading reveals that the minimum qualification for a case of Covid-19 is a positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms. These include headache, fever, cough, or mild nausea. This is far from adequate. These vaccine trials are testing to prevent common cold symptoms.
These trials certainly do not give assurance that the vaccine will protect from the serious consequences of Covid-19. Johnson & Johnson is the only trial that requires the inclusion of severe Covid-19 cases, at least 5 for the 75 participant interim analysis.
One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus? These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of Covid-19, and not infections themselves. Asymptomatic infection is listed as a secondary objective in these trials when they should be of critical importance.
It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group. They do not measure the difference between infection and noninfection as a primary motivation.
A greater concern for the millions of older people and those with preexisting conditions is whether these trials test the vaccine's ability to prevent severe illness and death. Again we find that severe illness and death are only secondary objectives in these trials. None list the prevention of death and hospitalization as a critically important barrier.
If total infections, hospitalizations, and death are going to be ignored in the preliminary trials of the vaccines, then there must be phase four testing to monitor their safety and efficacy. This would be long term massive scale monitoring of the vaccine. There must be an indication that the authorized vaccines are reducing infection, hospitalization, and death, or else they will not be able to stop this pandemic.
These protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of Covid-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death. It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success.
It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success. As this is being written, the FDA is poised to announce tougher standards for a Covid-19 vaccine in the near future. It is my hope that these new standards for an EUA will at a minimum include requirements for protections from infection itself, protections from severe virus-related disease leading to hospitalization, and a significant improvement in Covid-19 related mortality.
It is clear from these studies that the vaccines currently under trial will not be the silver bullet needed to end the pandemic. We must do all we can public health measures to control Covid-19 as China and other Asian countries have successfully done."