86 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

Vol. 88, pp. 1489-1493, February 1991

Genetics

In vitro apolipoprotein B mRNA editing: Identification of a 27S

editing complex

(cytidine/uridine "*editosome"/ mooring sequence)

HAROLD C. SMITH*†‡$, SHU-RU Kuot, JOHN W. BACKUst, STANLEY G. HARRIS*‡, CHARLES E. SPARKS*

AND JANET D. SPARKS*

Departments of *Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. *Biochemistry, and ‡The Cancer Center, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenuc, Rochester.

NY 14642

Communicated by Fred Sherman, November 14, 1990 (received for review June 14, 1990)

ABSTRACT

Specific apolipoprotein B (apoB) mRNA ed-

iting can be performed in vitro on apoB RNA substrates. Native

gels and glycerol gradient sedimentation have been used to

determine the physical properties of the in vitro editing activity

in rat liver cytosolic S100 extracts. ApoB RNA substrates were

progressively assembled as 27S complexes for 3 hr with similar

kinetics as seen for the accumulation of edited RNA. Assembly

was not observed on RNAs from apoB deletion constructs that

did not support editing. The 27S complex contained both edited

and unedited RNA sequences. Inhibition of 27S complex as-

sembly by vanady|-ribonucleoside complexes was accompa-

nied by inhibition of editing. Based on these data, we propose

that the 27S complex is the in vitro "editosome." A "mooring

sequence" model for RNA recognition and editosome assembly

has been proposed involving RNA sequences flanking the edited

nucleotide.

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is translated from a 14-kilobase (kb)

mRNA that is transcribed from a single-copy gene on human

chromosome 2 (1, 2). In rats (3-6) and humans (7), apoB

exists as a high molecular weight form (apoBH or apoB100)

and a low molecular weight form (apoB or apoB48). Al-

though apoB is synthesized from the same primary tran-

script as apoBH, its mRNA undergoes an unusual form of

RNA processing referred to here as "C/U RNA editing

wherein a cytidine at nucleotide 6666 is converted to a uridine

(8-11). This transition alters the sense of codon 2153 from

glutamine (CAA) to a translation stop (UAA). The contribu-

tion of apoBH very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) to low

density lipoprotein (LDL; an atherogenic risk factor) through

metabolic conversion in the plasma has focused attention on

the various metabolic levels where the apoBH/apoB ratio

correspondingly reduced to below detectable levels, while

apoB, synthesis remains relatively unaltered.

To a first approximation, apoB mRNA editing appears

similar to plant mitochondrial editing (20-22), which primar-

ily involves cytidine-to-uridine conversions under conditions

where the reading frame is maintained. It is believed that C/U

editing might be catalyzed by a form of cytidine deaminase

(23, 24), although other possibilities have not been ruled out.

Hemoflagellate mitochondrial mRNA editing differs from

apoB mRNA editing in that it involves insertion and deletion

of single or multiple uridine residues at single and multiple

sites (25-27). This form of editing results in extensive mod-

ification of mRNAs and their reading frames. Paramyxovirus

mRNA editing involves a different mechanism, wherein

single guanidine nucleotides are inserted at select sites within

a subset of mRNAs to produce major changes in the reading

frame (28).

Point mutant constructs of the apoB editing site suggest a

lax sequence requirement within the immediate vicinity of the

edited nucleotide (23). Mutants which place additional cy-

tidines adjacent to the editing site were edited at these

additional cytidine residues. The paradox of the editing

activity having absolute specificity for a single nucleotide yet

lacking selectivity when confronted with multiple cytidine

residues within the region suggests that editing specificity is

achieved by the positioning of the editing activity over the

correct nucleotide. A role for more distal sequences in this

process is suggested by deletion-mutant studies (24, 29, 30).

ApoB mRNA deletion constructs ranging in size from 2.4 kb

to 26 base pairs (p) were both expressed and edited in

transient expression assays with McArdle 7777 cells (29). In

contrast, transcripts from these subclones are all edited in

vitro bv McArdle cell cvtosolic S100 extracts excent the

Expand full comment