Jessica Rose's recent post has renewed my concerns that Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome may be the result of multiple infections/exposures to the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2
I wonder if the people who did this "deliberately engineered" it (as Spartacus stated elsewhere) to cause all of these secondary issues, or it they just weren't smart enough to realize what would happen. I do believe something was deliberately done in one manner or another, but if they meant for all of these secondary issues to occur (as Walter's doomsday theories note), then that means they have put themselves at risk, along with their families and friends, even their own children. I kind of think whatever they did backfired. Just because these people work in a scientific field doesn't mean they are geniuses. I think they screwed up. I'm also hoping your research is screwed up and that "this too shall pass", no offense. :)
that letter was wayyyy ahead of the curve.
A healthy immune system should be able to clear the spike protein in its "natural" form. Dr. Richard Fleming has pointed out that those who acquire the virus naturally obtain a few dozen thousand of the spike proteins that are susceptible to the body's own immune response. Spike proteins in the vaccines, however, which are produced by the billions with every injection, have been altered with the addition of M1-methyl-pseudouridine for every instance of naturally occurring uridine in the original spike protein, enabling the vaccine-induced spike protein to evade and escape the immune system's targeted response. That is key.
Also, the empirical data from all over the globe confirms that it is the vaccinated and boosted who are getting intensely ill and requiring hospitalization.
Did you hear the Sachs statement? He came out with it. It is a construct. I did a VAERS search using keywords from above that I have never heard before and associated factors and tests (<- c("Asherson’s Syndrome", "Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome", "antiphospholipid", "C5a", "C5b-9", "Microvascular thrombosis", "Ischemic tissue necrosis", "Livedo reticularis", "Cutaneous necrosis", "Digital gangrene", "Thrombocytopenia", "Ferritin")) and returned 4,163 individuals who submitted VAERS reports. When using only the keywords: (<- c("Asherson’s Syndrome", "Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome", "antiphospholipid", "Ashersons", "Anti-cardiolipin antibody", "Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein type I", "Lupus anticoagulant")), 694 are returned. No URF here. This condition is extremely rare and I can't tell you how many photos that look precisely like this I have seen in my AE groups. More evidence of an extreme anomaly. What changed recently? Hmm.
Below are the key point as I understand:
1.Viral load is irrelevant
2.Repeated exposure to the virus MUST BE STOPPED
3.Therapeutics MUST be found that prevent the spike protein from having the interaction with immune system
If so, why is it that ALL brilliant people like you and your colleagues are not focusing on Point 3?
Point 1 & 2 are outside of your control & REALM of probability of what is possible but point 3 is mostly down to exceptional individuals, uncorrupted humanitarians and your combined brain power. I cant help but wonder what it would take for your focus to shift to therapeutics that prevent the spike protein from having interactions with immune system?
There is no shortage of ways to improve thymus (and subsequently T cell) function. We should all be studying and sharing. Even simple things like spices, exercise, thymus extract, and gland stimulation are helpful. It's been known since at least 2009 that even HIV patients can reactivate their thymus glands.
Autoantibody formation in COVID-19 is also promoted by oxidative stress. The calcium overload of the infected cells, the amyloid formation, the bradykinin storm, NETosis - all of these things promote significant ROS release, lipid peroxidation, et cetera. Oxidation-specific epitopes form against lipid peroxidation products, like lupus. When combined with the molecular mimicry of the Spike, there are going to be a lot of different anti-self antibodies being formed, here.
Chilling. I remember you and Igor Chudov wrote/mentioned that some time ago....on twitter and on substack.
100% yes potentially, once your personal tolerance is exceeded. And the process once started may take years and be unstoppable.
I need to know more about spike protein and thymus pathology, it's a fairly new hypothesis.
In putting this review together it soon became apparent we have a huge public health disaster looming.
Autoimmune disorders: COVID-19, spike protein & homologous epitopes
A literature review
The mRNA shot is a smuggled weapon disguised as a various system failure. Walter has always been correct and it has been clear to me that this is conspiracy to commit murder.
"In a sense viral load is irrelevant.
The body clears the virus more quickly with a lower viral load, and does so with fewer acute symptoms. However, it is a repeated exposure to the virus (spike protein) which will break down self-tolerance."
i wonder if this initial conclusion from 2 years ago, still stands.
thank you Sir, for your great work, efforts and dedication to humanity.
I am unvaccinated, very healthy. Got Covid about 3 weeks ago and developed gout in my knee and a weird vibrating sensation that seems to be lingering. Last night I woke up with my heart racing and the vibration even more pronounced. Like an anxiety attack but not in my mind. I would really love some ideas to rid myself of this monster for good.
Walter - this also supports the UVB/Ozone hypothesis.
Both Churg-Straus and antiphospholipid syndrome are connected to both.
Inside the body the equivalent of UV photonic energy is being released as a stress response and the equivalent of ozone (oxidiser) is produced as a defensive response.
As Above So Below!
Is this true for Omicron Spike as well as the original SARS-CoV2 (Alpha, beta, delta versions)? I thought I read somewhere that the Omicron Spike is significantly different than the original Wuhan strain.
With great respect, I am uneasy where people use normative words with, supposedly, objective matters. To me, this is a contradiction. Of course, I am aware that with "science", like any subject, most exponents are just muddling through; assuming they do not have mens rea.